Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25768955›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2015

Genetics of common forms of heart failure: challenges and potential solutions.

Christoph D Rau, Aldons J Lusis, Yibin Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Using Omics to Identify Novel Therapeutic Targets in Heart Failure.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Big Data Approaches in Heart Failure Research.Current heart failure reports · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetics of Cardiovascular Disease: Fishing for Causality.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph D RauaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Physiology and Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Laboratories bDepartment of Human Genetics, Microbiology and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Aldons J Lusis
Yibin Wang

Funding

Systems Approach to Unraveling the Genetic Basis of Heart FailureR01HL114437 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DENG, MARIO C., KARMA, ALAIN S · 2013 to 2016
$4.7M
A Systems Approach to Dissect Genetic Basis of Heart FailureR01HL123295 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LUSIS, ALDONS JAKE, WANG, YIBIN · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL114437NHLBI NIH HHS HL123295NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114437NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn contrast to many other human diseases, the use of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify genes for heart failure (HF) has had limited success. We will discuss the underlying challenges as well as potential new approaches to understanding the genetics of common forms of HF. RECENT

findingsRecent research using intermediate phenotypes, more detailed and quantitative stratification of HF symptoms, founder populations and novel animal models has begun to allow researchers to make headway toward explaining the genetics underlying HF using GWAS techniques. SUMMARY: By expanding analyses of HF to improved clinical traits, additional HF classifications and innovative model systems, the intractability of human HF GWAS should be ameliorated significantly.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeart FailureHumans

Identifiers

PMID25768955
PMCPMC4406340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.