Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25768950›Full record

ReviewNutrients2015

What do studies of insect polyphenisms tell us about nutritionally-triggered epigenomic changes and their consequences?

Andrew G Cridge, Megan P Leask, Elizabeth J Duncan, Peter K Dearden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Changes of microorganism composition in fresh and stored bee pollen from Southern Germany.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  7. Epigenetics for the 21st-Century Biology Student.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew G CridgeGravida and Genetics Otago, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. andrew.cridge@otago.ac.nz.
Megan P LeaskGravida and Genetics Otago, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. megan.leask@otago.ac.nz.
Elizabeth J DuncanGravida and Genetics Otago, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. elizabeth.duncan@otago.ac.nz.
Peter K DeardenGravida and Genetics Otago, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. peter.dearden@otago.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insects are capable of remarkable changes in biology and form in response to their environment or diet. The most extreme example of these are polyphenisms, which are when two or more different phenotypes are produced from a single genotype in response to the environment. Polyphenisms provide a fascinating opportunity to study how the environment affects an animal's genome, and how this produces changes in form. Here we review the current state of knowledge of the molecular basis of polyphenisms and what can be learnt from them to understand how nutrition may influence our own genomes.

Indexed as

DietEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsGenotypePhenotypeAnimalsEnvironmentGenetic PleiotropyHumansInsectaNutritional Status

Identifiers

PMID25768950
PMCPMC4377881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.