Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25768435›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Recommendations for a core outcome set for measuring standing balance in adult populations: a consensus-based approach.

Kathryn M Sibley, Tracey Howe, Sarah E Lamb, Stephen R Lord, Brian E Maki, Debra J Rose, Vicky Scott, Liza Stathokostas, Sharon E Straus, Susan B Jaglal

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04201548 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Clinical and Physiological Response Among Three Modalities of Exercise Training in COPD With Chronic Respiratory Failure (CRF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2019 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsCopd, Chronic Hypoxemic Respiratory FailureArmsEndurance Training, Long High Intensity Interval Training, Short High Intensity Interval Training
NCT06075862 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Postural Imbalance Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion ZealandRan2023 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsLumbar Spinal StenosisArmsDecompressive surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential Item Functioning of the Mini-BESTest Balance Measure: A Rasch Analysis Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Kathryn M SibleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Tracey HoweSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Sarah E LambCentre for Rehabilitation Research, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stephen R LordNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Brian E MakiToronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Debra J RoseCalifornia State University Fullerton, Fullerton, California, United States of America.
Vicky ScottFaculty of Medicine, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; British Columbia Injury Research and Prevention Unit and Ministry of Health, Victoria, Canada.
Liza StathokostasCanadian Centre for Activity and Aging, Western University, London, Canada.
Sharon E StrausUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Susan B JaglalToronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACalifornia State University, Fullerton · USGlasgow Caledonian University · GBMinistry of Health · CAUniversity of Oxford · GBUNSW Sydney · AUWestern University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MAG133935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStanding balance is imperative for mobility and avoiding falls. Use of an excessive number of standing balance measures has limited the synthesis of balance intervention data and hampered consistent clinical practice.

objectiveTo develop recommendations for a core outcome set (COS) of standing balance measures for research and practice among adults. METHODOLOGY: A combination of scoping reviews, literature appraisal, anonymous voting and face-to-face meetings with fourteen invited experts from a range of disciplines with international recognition in balance measurement and falls prevention. Consensus was sought over three rounds using pre-established criteria. DATA SOURCES: The scoping review identified 56 existing standing balance measures validated in adult populations with evidence of use in the past five years, and these were considered for inclusion in the COS.

resultsFifteen measures were excluded after the first round of scoring and a further 36 after round two. Five measures were considered in round three. Two measures reached consensus for recommendation, and the expert panel recommended that at a minimum, either the Berg Balance Scale or Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test be used when measuring standing balance in adult populations. LIMITATIONS: Inclusion of two measures in the COS may increase the feasibility of potential uptake, but poses challenges for data synthesis. Adoption of the standing balance COS does not constitute a comprehensive balance assessment for any population, and users should include additional validated measures as appropriate.

conclusionsThe absence of a gold standard for measuring standing balance has contributed to the proliferation of outcome measures. These recommendations represent an important first step towards greater standardization in the assessment and measurement of this critical skill and will inform clinical research and practice internationally.

Indexed as

ConsensusDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresPostural BalanceAccidental FallsAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansMovement

Identifiers

PMID25768435
PMCPMC4358983
OpenAlexW2031290524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.