Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25768331›Full record

ReviewCNS oncology2015

Depression screening in patients with brain tumors: a review.

Aiste Pranckeviciene, Adomas Bunevicius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Home Care for the Elderly: An Integrated Approach to Perception, Quality of Life, and Cognition.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Associations ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aiste PranckevicieneNeuroscience Institute, Laboratory of Clinical Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu g. 4, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Adomas Bunevicius
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor (BT) is often a devastating disease associated with poor prognosis. Depression is a common complication in BT patients that often remains under-recognized and untreated. Implementation of reliable depression screening algorithms in routine neuro-oncology setting could potentially improve recognition of depression. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-Depression subscale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for depressive disorder screening in glioma patients. Patients screened positive for depression should be referred for detailed psychiatric assessment prior to initiating anti-depressive treatment. Further methodologically rigorous studies investigating psychometric properties of single-item and multiple-item depression scales are urgently warranted. Studies evaluating anti-depressive treatments' efficacy and clinical value of depression biomarkers are important avenues for future research endeavors in BT patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDepressionHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnairesbrain tumorsdepressiondiagnostic accuracyscreening

Identifiers

PMID25768331
PMCPMC6093018
OpenAlexW2106420181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.