Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767795›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

Transcription interference and ORF nature strongly affect promoter strength in a reconstituted metabolic pathway.

Marie Carquet, Denis Pompon, Gilles Truan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine Learning-Guided Optimization ofACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EngineeringFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie CarquetUniversité de Toulouse, INSA, UPS, INP, LISBP , Toulouse , France ; INRA, UMR792 Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés , Toulouse , France ; CNRS, UMR5504 , Toulouse , France.
Denis PomponUniversité de Toulouse, INSA, UPS, INP, LISBP , Toulouse , France ; INRA, UMR792 Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés , Toulouse , France ; CNRS, UMR5504 , Toulouse , France.
Gilles TruanUniversité de Toulouse, INSA, UPS, INP, LISBP , Toulouse , France ; INRA, UMR792 Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés , Toulouse , France ; CNRS, UMR5504 , Toulouse , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine tuning of individual enzyme expression level is necessary to alleviate metabolic imbalances in synthetic heterologous pathways. A known approach consists of choosing a suitable combination of promoters, based on their characterized strengths in model conditions. We questioned whether each step of a multiple-gene synthetic pathway could be independently tunable at the transcription level. Three open reading frames, coding for enzymes involved in a synthetic pathway, were combinatorially associated to different promoters on an episomal plasmid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We quantified the mRNA levels of the three genes in each strain of our generated combinatorial metabolic library. Our results evidenced that the ORF nature, position, and orientation induce strong discrepancies between the previously reported promoters' strengths and the observed ones. We conclude that, in the context of metabolic reconstruction, the strength of usual promoters can be dramatically affected by many factors. Among them, transcriptional interference and ORF nature seem to be predominant.

Indexed as

combinatorial metabolic librariesexpression tuningmetabolic engineeringplasmid-encoded metabolic pathwaySaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25767795
PMCPMC4341558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.