Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Predawn and high intensity application of supplemental blue light decreases the quantum yield of PSII and enhances the amount of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and pigments in Lactuca sativa.

Theoharis Ouzounis, Behnaz Razi Parjikolaei, Xavier Fretté, Eva Rosenqvist, Carl-Otto Ottosen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AoB PLANTS · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Illuminating the harvest: the regulatory effects of LEDs on pigment accumulation in various food crops.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Growth, Evapotranspiration, Gas Exchange andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Pigments and Cryptochrome 1 in the Adaptation ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theoharis OuzounisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark Odense, Denmark.
Behnaz Razi ParjikolaeiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark Odense, Denmark.
Xavier FrettéDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark Odense, Denmark.
Eva RosenqvistSection for Crop Sciences, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen Taastrup, Denmark.
Carl-Otto OttosenDepartment of Food Science, Plant, Food & Climate, Aarhus University Aarslev, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of blue light intensity and timing, two cultivars of lettuce [Lactuca sativa cv. "Batavia" (green) and cv. "Lollo Rossa" (red)] were grown in a greenhouse compartment in late winter under natural light and supplemental high pressure sodium (SON-T) lamps yielding 90 (±10) μmol m(-2) s(-1) for up to 20 h, but never between 17:00 and 21:00. The temperature in the greenhouse compartments was 22/11°C day/night, respectively. The five light-emitting diode (LED) light treatments were Control (no blue addition), 1B 06-08 (Blue light at 45 μmol m(-2) s(-1) from 06:00 to 08:00), 1B 21-08 (Blue light at 45 μmol m(-2) s(-1) from 21:00 to 08:00), 2B 17-19 (Blue at 80 μmol m(-2) s(-1) from 17:00 to 19:00), and 1B 17-19 (Blue at 45 μmol m(-2) s(-1) from 17:00 to 19:00). Total fresh and dry weight was not affected with additional blue light; however, plants treated with additional blue light were more compact. The stomatal conductance in the green lettuce cultivar was higher for all treatments with blue light compared to the Control. Photosynthetic yields measured with chlorophyll fluorescence showed different response between the cultivars; in red lettuce, the quantum yield of PSII decreased and the yield of non-photochemical quenching increased with increasing blue light, whereas in green lettuce no difference was observed. Quantification of secondary metabolites showed that all four treatments with additional blue light had higher amount of pigments, phenolic acids, and flavonoids compared to the Control. The effect was more prominent in red lettuce, highlighting that the results vary among treatments and compounds. Our results indicate that not only high light level triggers photoprotective heat dissipation in the plant, but also the specific spectral composition of the light itself at low intensities. However, these plant responses to light are cultivar dependent.

Indexed as

blue lightchlorophyll fluorescencelettucelight-emitting diodesquantum efficiency of photosystem IIsecondary metabolitesstomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID25767473
PMCPMC4341431
OpenAlexW2063851335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.