Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767411›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2015

Effects of parecoxib on analgesia benefit and blood loss following open prostatectomy: a multicentre randomized trial.

Daniel Dirkmann, Harald Groeben, Hassan Farhan, David L Stahl, Matthias Eikermann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00346268 (Randomized, Double-Blind Study Of The Morphine-Sparing Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib Sodium 40 Mg IV Followed By 20 Mg IV Every 12 Hours In The Treatment Of Pain Following Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00346268 phase4terminatednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind Study Of The Morphine-Sparing Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib Sodium 40 Mg IV Followed By 20 Mg IV Every 12 Hours In The Treatment Of Pain Following Radical Prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2006 to 2010Enrolled105ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsMorphine, Parecoxib, Morphine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel DirkmannKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen, D-45144 Germany.
Harald GroebenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistrasse 92, Essen, 45136 Germany.
Hassan FarhanDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
David L StahlDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Matthias EikermannKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen, D-45144 Germany ; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USEssen University Hospital · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis multi-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test the hypotheses that parecoxib improves patients' postoperative analgesia without increasing surgical blood loss following radical open prostatectomy.

methods105 patients (64 ± 7 years old) were randomized to receive either parecoxib or placebo with concurrent morphine patient controlled analgesia. Cumulative opioid consumption (primary objective) and the overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS), the modified brief pain inventory short form (m-BPI-sf), the opioid-related symptom distress scale (OR-SDS), and perioperative blood loss (secondary objectives) were assessed.

resultsIn each group 48 patients received the study medication for 48 hours postoperatively. Parecoxib significantly reduced cumulative opioid consumption by 24% (43 ± 24.1 mg versus 57 ± 28 mg, mean ± SD, p=0.02), translating into improved benefit of analgesia (OBAS: 2(0/4) versus 3(1/5.25), p=0.01), pain severity (m-BPI-sf: 1(1/2) versus 2(2/3), p < 0.01) and pain interference (m-BPI-sf: 1(0/1) versus 1(1/3), p=0.001), as well as reduced opioid-related side effects (OR-SDS score: 0.3(0.075/0.51) versus 0.4(0.2/0.83), p=0.03). Blood loss was significantly higher at 24 hours following surgery in the parecoxib group (4.3 g⋅dL(-1) (3.6/4.9) versus (3.2 g⋅dL(-1) (2.4/4.95), p=0.02).

conclusionsFollowing major abdominal surgery, parecoxib significantly improves patients' perceived analgesia. Parecoxib may however increase perioperative blood loss. Further trials are needed to evaluate the effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on blood loss.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00346268.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIsoxazolesMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative HemorrhagePostoperative PainProstatectomyAnalgesics, OpioidCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsIsoxazolesMorphineparecoxibAnalgesics non-opioidsAnalgesics opioidsMorphinePainParecoxibPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID25767411
PMCPMC4357198
OpenAlexW1997611134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.