ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2014
Can molecular subtyping replace axillary nodal status as prognostic marker in breast cancer?
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Features at Incidence in Indian Patients With Breast Cancer.JCO global oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Molecular Profile and Clinico-pathological Characteristics of Breast Cancer in Central India: First Investigative Report.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in India: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Review
- Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in India: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of global oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subtypes are an established prognostic factor of BC in western population but its significance in Indian BC patients has not been evaluated. Thus this study provides an insight into the prognostic significance of molecular classification and its effect on the survival of BC patients in Eastern India. In this hospital based study 242 BC patients attending a Comprehensive Breast Service Clinic of a reputed institute in Eastern India and having IDC were studied over a period of 7 years (January 2007 to October 2013). Nonluminal HER-2-positive and Triple negative tumors were associated with advanced stage of disease, metastatic lymph nodes and NPI ≥5.4, whereas Luminal 1 and Luminal 2 tumors were associated with early stage, uninvolved lymph nodes and NPI <5.4. Better survival was observed for the patients with Luminal 1 [OS = 57.1 % (n = 36)] and Luminal 2 [OS = 60.0 % (n = 6)], compared to Triple negative [OS = 33.6 % (n = 38)] and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors [OS = 32.1 % (n = 18)]. This study provided some idea about the pattern of BC on the basis of classification by molecular profiling. Our study indicated that Triple negative and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors have reduced DFS and OS compared with luminal 1 and 2 subtypes. In our patients, Triple negative and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors were associated with established unfavorable prognostic indicators and this reflects the data in the western literature. The results suggest that the molecular subtypes are an independent prognostic and predictive marker in Indian BC patients. Whether or not molecular subtyping of breast cancer can replace axillary lymph nodes as the standard in prognosis remains to be seen, but if molecular subtyping can provide more information than the axilla about the prognosis and treatment option, it may well be the future of prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.