Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767340›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2014

Can molecular subtyping replace axillary nodal status as prognostic marker in breast cancer?

Debarshi Jana, Diptendra Kumar Sarkar, Suvro Ganguly, Abhirup Banerjee, Asim Kumar Manna, Syamsundar Mandal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Debarshi JanaComprehensive Breast Service and Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (IPGME&R) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (SSKM), Kolkata, 700020 India.
Diptendra Kumar SarkarComprehensive Breast Service and Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (IPGME&R) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (SSKM), Kolkata, 700020 India.
Suvro GangulyComprehensive Breast Service and Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (IPGME&R) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (SSKM), Kolkata, 700020 India.
Abhirup BanerjeeComprehensive Breast Service and Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (IPGME&R) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (SSKM), Kolkata, 700020 India.
Asim Kumar MannaComprehensive Breast Service and Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (IPGME&R) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (SSKM), Kolkata, 700020 India.
Syamsundar MandalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, 37, S.P. Mukherjee Road, Kolkata, 700026 India.
Memorial Hospital of South Bend · USChittaranjan National Cancer Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subtypes are an established prognostic factor of BC in western population but its significance in Indian BC patients has not been evaluated. Thus this study provides an insight into the prognostic significance of molecular classification and its effect on the survival of BC patients in Eastern India. In this hospital based study 242 BC patients attending a Comprehensive Breast Service Clinic of a reputed institute in Eastern India and having IDC were studied over a period of 7 years (January 2007 to October 2013). Nonluminal HER-2-positive and Triple negative tumors were associated with advanced stage of disease, metastatic lymph nodes and NPI ≥5.4, whereas Luminal 1 and Luminal 2 tumors were associated with early stage, uninvolved lymph nodes and NPI <5.4. Better survival was observed for the patients with Luminal 1 [OS = 57.1 % (n = 36)] and Luminal 2 [OS = 60.0 % (n = 6)], compared to Triple negative [OS = 33.6 % (n = 38)] and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors [OS = 32.1 % (n = 18)]. This study provided some idea about the pattern of BC on the basis of classification by molecular profiling. Our study indicated that Triple negative and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors have reduced DFS and OS compared with luminal 1 and 2 subtypes. In our patients, Triple negative and nonluminal HER-2-positive tumors were associated with established unfavorable prognostic indicators and this reflects the data in the western literature. The results suggest that the molecular subtypes are an independent prognostic and predictive marker in Indian BC patients. Whether or not molecular subtyping of breast cancer can replace axillary lymph nodes as the standard in prognosis remains to be seen, but if molecular subtyping can provide more information than the axilla about the prognosis and treatment option, it may well be the future of prognostication.

Indexed as

Breast cancerNottingham Prognostic Index (NPI)Prognostic significanceSubtypesSurvival

Identifiers

PMID25767340
PMCPMC4354832
OpenAlexW2033551323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.