Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767211›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2015

Targeting nodal in conjunction with dacarbazine induces synergistic anticancer effects in metastatic melanoma.

Katharine M Hardy, Luigi Strizzi, Naira V Margaryan, Kanika Gupta, George F Murphy, Richard A Scolyer, Mary J C Hendrix

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting melanoma with front-line therapy does not abrogate Nodal-expressing tumor cells.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharine M HardyProgram in Cancer Biology and Epigenomics, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Luigi StrizziProgram in Cancer Biology and Epigenomics, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Naira V MargaryanProgram in Cancer Biology and Epigenomics, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Kanika GuptaProgram in Cancer Biology and Epigenomics, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Howard Hughes Medical Institute NU Bioscientist Program, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
George F MurphyDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard A ScolyerMelanoma Institute Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney; and Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mary J C HendrixProgram in Cancer Biology and Epigenomics, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. m-hendrix@northwestern.edu.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143869 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MATOUSCHEK, ANDREAS · 2009 to 2013
$12.8M
Endothelial Transdifferentiation of Invasive Tumor CellsR37CA059702 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HENDRIX, MARY J.C. · 2002 to 2011
$3.9M
Epigenetic Effect of the Microenvironment on Stem Cell Plasticity and FunctionR01CA121205 · NCI · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI HENDRIX, MARY J.C. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121205NCI NIH HHS R01CA121205NCI NIH HHS R37 CA059702NCI NIH HHS R37CA59702NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143869NCI NIH HHS U54CA143869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMetastatic melanoma is a highly aggressive skin cancer with a poor prognosis. Despite a complete response in fewer than 5% of patients, the chemotherapeutic agent dacarbazine (DTIC) remains the reference drug after almost 40 years. More recently, FDA-approved drugs have shown promise but patient outcome remains modest, predominantly due to drug resistance. As such, combinatorial targeting has received increased attention, and will advance with the identification of new molecular targets. One attractive target for improving melanoma therapy is the growth factor Nodal, whose normal expression is largely restricted to embryonic development, but is reactivated in metastatic melanoma. In this study, we sought to determine how Nodal-positive human melanoma cells respond to DTIC treatment and to ascertain whether targeting Nodal in combination with DTIC would be more effective than monotherapy. A single treatment with DTIC inhibited cell growth but did not induce apoptosis. Rather than reducing Nodal expression, DTIC increased the size of the Nodal-positive subpopulation, an observation coincident with increased cellular invasion. Importantly, clinical tissue specimens from patients with melanomas refractory to DTIC therapy stained positive for Nodal expression, both in pre- and post-DTIC tumors, underscoring the value of targeting Nodal. In vitro, anti-Nodal antibodies alone had some adverse effects on proliferation and apoptosis, but combining DTIC treatment with anti-Nodal antibodies decreased cell growth and increased apoptosis synergistically, at concentrations incapable of producing meaningful effects as monotherapy. IMPLICATIONS: Targeting Nodal in combination with DTIC therapy holds promise for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDacarbazineDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMelanomaMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisNodal ProteinSkin NeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDacarbazineNodal ProteinNODAL protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25767211
PMCPMC4398626
OpenAlexW1991856541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.