Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25767185›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Use of Standardized Uptake Value Ratios Decreases Interreader Variability of [18F] Florbetapir PET Brain Scan Interpretation.

A P Nayate, J G Dubroff, J E Schmitt, I Nasrallah, R Kishore, D Mankoff, D A Pryma, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PET molecular imaging for pathophysiological visualization in Alzheimer's disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Review
  13. Clinical impact of amyloid PET usingAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. A comparison of advanced semi-quantitative amyloid PET analysis methods.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  15. Decreased imaging time of amyloid PET using [Radiological physics and technology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Visual interpretation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A P NayateFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J G DubroffFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J E SchmittFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
I NasrallahFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
R KishoreFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
D MankoffFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
D A PrymaFrom the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. daniel.pryma@uphs.upenn.edu.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
CIHRNIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFluorine-18 florbetapir is a recently developed β-amyloid plaque positron-emission tomography imaging agent with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of moderate-to-frequent cerebral cortical β-amyloid plaque. However, the FDA has expressed concerns about the consistency of interpretation of [(18)F] florbetapir PET brain scans. We hypothesized that incorporating automated cerebral-to-whole-cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios into [(18)F] florbetapir PET brain scan interpretation would reduce this interreader variability. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized, blinded-reader study used previously acquired [(18)F] florbetapir scans from 30 anonymized patients who were enrolled in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2. In 4 separate, blinded-reading sessions, 5 readers classified 30 cases as positive or negative for significant β-amyloid deposition either qualitatively alone or qualitatively with additional adjunct software that determined standardized uptake value ratios. A κ coefficient was used to calculate interreader agreement with and without the use of standardized uptake value ratios.

resultsThere was complete interreader agreement on 20/30 cases of [(18)F] florbetapir PET brain scans by using qualitative interpretation and on 27/30 scans interpreted with the adjunct use of standardized uptake value ratios. The κ coefficient for the studies read with standardized uptake value ratios (0.92) was significantly higher compared with the qualitatively read studies (0.69, P = .006).

conclusionsUse of standardized uptake value ratios improves interreader agreement in the interpretation of [(18)F] florbetapir images.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAniline CompoundsBrainEthylene GlycolsFemaleHumansMaleNeuroimagingObserver VariationPositron-Emission TomographyAniline CompoundsEthylene Glycolsflorbetapir

Identifiers

PMID25767185
PMCPMC7965291
OpenAlexW2152663843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.