Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25765913›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2015

Progression to regular heroin use: examination of patterns, predictors, and consequences.

Eric A Woodcock, Leslie H Lundahl, Jonathan J K Stoltman, Mark K Greenwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Female rats self-administer heroin by vapor inhalation.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric A WoodcockDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Leslie H LundahlDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Jonathan J K StoltmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Mark K GreenwaldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: mgreen@med.wayne.edu.

Funding

Biobehavioral Studies of Opioid Seeking: Effects of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Dose on Experimental Stress Reactivity and Opioid AbstinenceR01DA015462 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENWALD, MARK K · 2003 to 2019
$5.5M
Selective radiolabeled agonists /antagonists for opiate receptor subtypesP50DA000254 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOODS, JAMES H · 1985 to 2002
$5.0M
Narcotic Drug and Opioid Peptide Basic Research projectP01DA000254 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOODS, JAMES H · 2003 to 2006
$5.0M
Reducing Cocaine/Heroin Abuse with SR-Amphetamine and BuprenorphineR01DA022243 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENWALD, MARK K · 2006 to 2009
$980k
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA000254NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA000254NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA00254NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015462NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study retrospectively evaluated the chronology and predictors of substance use progression in current heroin-using individuals.

methodsOut-of-treatment heroin users (urinalysis-verified; N=562) were screened for laboratory-based research studies using questionnaires and urinalysis. Comprehensive substance use histories were collected. Between- and within-substance use progression was analyzed using stepwise linear regression models.

resultsThe strongest predictor of onset of regular heroin use was age at initial heroin use, accounting for 71.8% of variance. The strongest between-substance predictors of regular heroin use were ages at regular alcohol and tobacco use, accounting for 8.1% of variance. Earlier onset of regular heroin use (≤20 years) vs. older onset (≥30 years) was associated with a more rapid progression from initial to regular use, longer duration of heroin use, more lifetime use-related negative consequences, and greater likelihood of injecting heroin. The majority of participants (79.7%) reported substance use progression consistent with the gateway hypothesis. Gateway-inconsistent individuals were more likely to be African-American and to report younger age at initial use, longer duration of heroin use, and more frequent past-month heroin use.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate the predictive validity and clinical relevance of evaluating substance use chronology and the gateway hypothesis pattern of progression.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge of OnsetAlcohol DrinkingBlack or African AmericanCocaine-Related DisordersCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGateway hypothesisHeroin use disorderOpioidSubstance use progression

Identifiers

PMID25765913
PMCPMC5541382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.