Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25765543›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2015

Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors prevent disease progression in high-risk (high CIP2A) chronic myeloid leukaemia patients.

C M Lucas, R J Harris, A K Holcroft, L J Scott, N Carmell, E McDonald, F Polydoros, R E Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Blood · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C M LucasSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
R J HarrisSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
A K HolcroftSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
L J ScottSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
N CarmellSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
E McDonaldSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
F PolydorosCR-UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
R E ClarkSection of Haematology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High cancerous inhibitor of PP2A (CIP2A) protein levels at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) are predictive of disease progression in imatinib-treated patients. It is not known whether this is true in patients treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G TKI) from diagnosis, and whether 2G TKIs modulate the CIP2A pathway. Here, we show that patients with high diagnostic CIP2A levels who receive a 2G TKI do not progress, unlike those treated with imatinib (P=<0.0001). 2G TKIs induce more potent suppression of CIP2A and c-Myc than imatinib. The transcription factor E2F1 is elevated in high CIP2A patients and following 1 month of in vivo treatment 2G TKIs suppress E2F1 and reduce CIP2A; these effects are not seen with imatinib. Silencing of CIP2A, c-Myc or E2F1 in K562 cells or CML CD34+ cells reactivates PP2A leading to BCR-ABL suppression. CIP2A increases proliferation and this is only reduced by 2G TKIs. Patients with high CIP2A levels should be offered 2G TKI treatment in preference to imatinib. 2G TKIs disrupt the CIP2A/c-Myc/E2F1 positive feedback loop, leading to lower disease progression risk. The data supports the view that CIP2A inhibits PP2Ac, stabilising E2F1, creating a CIP2A/c-Myc/E2F1 positive feedback loop, which imatinib cannot overcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAutoantigensBlotting, WesternCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmE2F1 Transcription FactorFemaleFlow CytometryFollow-Up StudiesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleAutoantigensCIP2A protein, humanE2F1 protein, humanE2F1 Transcription FactorFusion Proteins, bcr-ablIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMYC protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID25765543
OpenAlexW1984551975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.