Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25765323›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2015

Towards the automatic classification of neurons.

Rubén Armañanzas, Giorgio A Ascoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Betz cells of the primary motor cortex.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Circuit analysis of theNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell types as species: Exploring a metaphor.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  16. Efficient metadata mining of web-accessible neural morphologies.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rubén ArmañanzasKrasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Giorgio A AscoliKrasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. Electronic address: ascoli@gmu.edu.

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
Cytoskeletal mechanisms of dendrite arbor shape developmentR01NS086082 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A, COX, DANIEL N · 2013 to 2023
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS86082NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086082NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS39600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of neurons into types has been much debated since the inception of modern neuroscience. Recent experimental advances are accelerating the pace of data collection. The resulting growth of information about morphological, physiological, and molecular properties encourages efforts to automate neuronal classification by powerful machine learning techniques. We review state-of-the-art analysis approaches and the availability of suitable data and resources, highlighting prominent challenges and opportunities. The effective solution of the neuronal classification problem will require continuous development of computational methods, high-throughput data production, and systematic metadata organization to enable cross-laboratory integration.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningAnimalsHumansNeuronsbig datamachine learningmetadataneural classificationstandardization

Identifiers

PMID25765323
PMCPMC4417416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.