Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25765216›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel.

Judith Burstin, Pauline Salloignon, Marianne Chabert-Martinello, Jean-Bernard Magnin-Robert, Mathieu Siol, Françoise Jacquin, Aurélie Chauveau, Caroline Pont, Grégoire Aubert, Catherine Delaitre and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Which RJournal of human genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrated agronomy of pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a WideInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Judith BurstinUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. judith.burstin@dijon.inra.fr.
Pauline SalloignonClinical and Innovation Proteomic Platform (CLIPP), CHU Dijon, Université de Bourgogne, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France. pauline.salloignon@clipproteomic.fr.
Marianne Chabert-MartinelloUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. marianne.martinello@dijon.inra.fr.
Jean-Bernard Magnin-RobertUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. magninro@dijon.inra.fr.
Mathieu SiolUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. mathieu.siol@dijon.inra.fr.
Françoise JacquinUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. francoise.jacquin@dijon.inra.fr.
Aurélie ChauveauUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. chauveau@cng.fr.
Caroline PontUMR GDEC, Plateforme Gentyane, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France. caroline.pont@clermont.inra.fr.
Grégoire AubertUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. gregoire.aubert@dijon.inra.fr.
Catherine DelaitreUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. catherine.delaitre@dijon.inra.fr.
Caroline TruntzerClinical and Innovation Proteomic Platform (CLIPP), CHU Dijon, Université de Bourgogne, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, 21000, France. caroline.truntzer@clipproteomic.fr.
Gérard DucUMR1347, Agroecology, INRA, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21065, France. gerard.Duc@dijon.inra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPea (Pisum sativum L.), a major pulse crop grown for its protein-rich seeds, is an important component of agroecological cropping systems in diverse regions of the world. New breeding challenges imposed by global climate change and new regulations urge pea breeders to undertake more efficient methods of selection and better take advantage of the large genetic diversity present in the Pisum sativum genepool. Diversity studies conducted so far in pea used Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) and Retrotransposon Based Insertion Polymorphism (RBIP) markers. Recently, SNP marker panels have been developed that will be useful for genetic diversity assessment and marker-assisted selection.

resultsA collection of diverse pea accessions, including landraces and cultivars of garden, field or fodder peas as well as wild peas was characterised at the molecular level using newly developed SNP markers, as well as SSR markers and RBIP markers. The three types of markers were used to describe the structure of the collection and revealed different pictures of the genetic diversity among the collection. SSR showed the fastest rate of evolution and RBIP the slowest rate of evolution, pointing to their contrasted mode of evolution. SNP markers were then used to predict phenotypes -the date of flowering (BegFlo), the number of seeds per plant (Nseed) and thousand seed weight (TSW)- that were recorded for the collection. Different statistical methods were tested including the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage ans Selection Operator), PLS (Partial Least Squares), SPLS (Sparse Partial Least Squares), Bayes A, Bayes B and GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) methods and the structure of the collection was taken into account in the prediction. Despite a limited number of 331 markers used for prediction, TSW was reliably predicted.

conclusionThe development of marker assisted selection has not reached its full potential in pea until now. This paper shows that the high-throughput SNP arrays that are being developed will most probably allow for a more efficient selection in this species.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantBayes TheoremDiscriminant AnalysisGenetic MarkersGenotypeLeast-Squares AnalysisLinear ModelsMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypePisum sativumPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25765216
PMCPMC4355348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.