ArticleBMC genomics2015
Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which RJournal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic and molecular breeding perspectives on developing abiotic stress tolerant pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction for grain yield and biotic stress resistance in field pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genetic variation and genome-enabled selection of white lupin for key seed quality traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Holobiont-based genetic analysis reveals new plant and microbial markers for resistance against a root rot pathogen complex in pea.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genetic and molecular approaches for Fusarium wilt resistance in garden pea: advances and future outlook.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Genomic prediction in Persian walnut: Optimization levers according to genetic architecture of complex traits.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield and Protein Content in Italian Environments for Target and Non-Target Genetic Bases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Integrated agronomy of pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Assessment of the potential for genomic selection to improve resistance to fusarium stalk rot in maize.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comparison of phenotypic selection of inbred lines, genomic selection of inbred lines, and evolutionary populations for field pea breeding in three Mediterranean regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction for agronomic traits in a diverse Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) germplasm collection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of a diverse panel of pea (Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Shanlan Upland Rice Were Revealed Based on 214 Upland Rice SSR Markers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a WideInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Pea Breeding for Resistance to Rhizospheric Pathogens.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Large-Scale Heat-Tolerance Screening and Genetic Diversity of Pea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization and Correlation Analysis of Pea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tracking Ideal Varieties and Cropping Techniques for Agroecological Weed Management: A Simulation-Based Study on Pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPea (Pisum sativum L.), a major pulse crop grown for its protein-rich seeds, is an important component of agroecological cropping systems in diverse regions of the world. New breeding challenges imposed by global climate change and new regulations urge pea breeders to undertake more efficient methods of selection and better take advantage of the large genetic diversity present in the Pisum sativum genepool. Diversity studies conducted so far in pea used Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) and Retrotransposon Based Insertion Polymorphism (RBIP) markers. Recently, SNP marker panels have been developed that will be useful for genetic diversity assessment and marker-assisted selection.
resultsA collection of diverse pea accessions, including landraces and cultivars of garden, field or fodder peas as well as wild peas was characterised at the molecular level using newly developed SNP markers, as well as SSR markers and RBIP markers. The three types of markers were used to describe the structure of the collection and revealed different pictures of the genetic diversity among the collection. SSR showed the fastest rate of evolution and RBIP the slowest rate of evolution, pointing to their contrasted mode of evolution. SNP markers were then used to predict phenotypes -the date of flowering (BegFlo), the number of seeds per plant (Nseed) and thousand seed weight (TSW)- that were recorded for the collection. Different statistical methods were tested including the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage ans Selection Operator), PLS (Partial Least Squares), SPLS (Sparse Partial Least Squares), Bayes A, Bayes B and GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) methods and the structure of the collection was taken into account in the prediction. Despite a limited number of 331 markers used for prediction, TSW was reliably predicted.
conclusionThe development of marker assisted selection has not reached its full potential in pea until now. This paper shows that the high-throughput SNP arrays that are being developed will most probably allow for a more efficient selection in this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.