Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25764478›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2015

A work time study analysing differences in resource use between psychiatric inpatients.

Jan Wolff, Paul McCrone, Mathias Berger, Anita Patel, Christian Ackermann, Katja Gerhardt, Claus Normann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan WolffInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, London, UK, jan.wolff@kcl.ac.uk.
Paul McCrone
Mathias Berger
Anita Patel
Christian Ackermann
Katja Gerhardt
Claus Normann
King's College London · GBUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeJudgement about the adequacy of reimbursement schemes requires an understanding of differences in resource use between patient groups. The aim of this study was to analyse staff time allocation of psychiatrists, psychologists and nurses in inpatient mental health care and to use these data to analyse differences in per diem resource use between patient groups.

methodsA self-reporting work-sampling study was carried out at a psychiatric teaching hospital. All of 36 psychiatrists, 23 psychologists and 106 nurses involved in clinical care during the study period participated in a two-week measurement of their work time.

resultsA total of 20,380 observations were collected, representing about 10,190 h of work or 6.2 full-time-equivalent years. The average resource use in minutes of staff time per patient day was 227 min, representing 138 <euro> of staff costs. The most resource intensive care was provided at the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit and for geriatric patients with 334 and 266 min per patient day (192 and 162 <euro>), respectively. The least resource intensive care was provided for patients with substance-related disorders (197 min, 116 <euro>). Substantial shares of clinical work time were dedicated to tasks without patient contact (58 %). Nursing time was the main driver of total resource use, representing 70 % of staff time and 60 % of costs.

conclusionPresented differences in per diem resource use should inform discussions about the adequacy of reimbursement schemes. Tasks in the absence of the patient, such as documentation and administration, should be reduced to free resources for direct patient care.

Indexed as

Time and Motion StudiesAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleGermanyHealth ResourcesHospitals, PsychiatricHospitals, TeachingHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective Payment SystemPsychiatric NursingPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID25764478
OpenAlexW2068807054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.