Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25764132›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015

[The role of colloids in intensive care medicine. Evidence instead of emotions].

C S Bruells, A Schindler, G Marx

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C S BruellsKlinik für operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland, cbruells@ukaachen.de.
A Schindler
G Marx
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesides albumin, which is gained from human donors, synthetic colloids have been playing a dominant role in treating patients in shock and are standard therapy in intensive care units (ICU). Since the publication of large randomized controlled trials indicating negative effects on renal function, their use has been questioned, especially for hydroxyethyl starch products. The preliminary assumption that these side effects are only existent in first or secondary generation starch fluids was proven incorrect. In fact, the use of hydroxyethyl starch products in critically ill patients is prohibited by the European Medicines Agency. CURRENT DISCUSSION AND INDICATIONS: Several methodological limitations exist in each of these trials that limit the evidence value of these investigations, although they served as the basis for the negative judgment of the European Medicines Agency. In addition, a large randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of gelatin is lacking. The use of colloids in ICU patients is indicated in cases where crystalloid volume therapy is inadequate.

conclusionEspecially during the first 6 h of sepsis, when aggressive volume therapy is decisive for patient outcome, colloids may be relevant to increase patient survival. The latest guideline on treatment with colloids has been published in the German S3 guideline "Intravascular volume therapy in adults."

Indexed as

EmotionsEvidence-Based MedicineAdultAlbuminsColloidsCritical CareEarly Medical InterventionFluid TherapyGelatinGuideline AdherenceHumansHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesSepsisAlbuminsColloidsGelatinHydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives

Identifiers

PMID25764132
OpenAlexW2178001685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.