ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015
[The role of colloids in intensive care medicine. Evidence instead of emotions].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBesides albumin, which is gained from human donors, synthetic colloids have been playing a dominant role in treating patients in shock and are standard therapy in intensive care units (ICU). Since the publication of large randomized controlled trials indicating negative effects on renal function, their use has been questioned, especially for hydroxyethyl starch products. The preliminary assumption that these side effects are only existent in first or secondary generation starch fluids was proven incorrect. In fact, the use of hydroxyethyl starch products in critically ill patients is prohibited by the European Medicines Agency. CURRENT DISCUSSION AND INDICATIONS: Several methodological limitations exist in each of these trials that limit the evidence value of these investigations, although they served as the basis for the negative judgment of the European Medicines Agency. In addition, a large randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of gelatin is lacking. The use of colloids in ICU patients is indicated in cases where crystalloid volume therapy is inadequate.
conclusionEspecially during the first 6 h of sepsis, when aggressive volume therapy is decisive for patient outcome, colloids may be relevant to increase patient survival. The latest guideline on treatment with colloids has been published in the German S3 guideline "Intravascular volume therapy in adults."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.