Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25764071›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Fluid replacement therapy for acute episodes of pain in people with sickle cell disease.

Uduak Okomo, Martin M Meremikwu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07188766 (Fluid Management in Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07188766 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Fluid Management in Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis: Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategies: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FLASC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled394ConditionsSCD, Vaso Occlussive CrisisArmsSodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Uduak OkomoViral Diseases Programme, Medical Research Council (UK), Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, Gambia, P.O. Box 273.
Martin M Meremikwu
Medical Research Council · GBUniversity of Calabar · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreating vaso-occlusive painful crises in people with sickle cell disease is complex and requires multiple interventions. Extra fluids are routinely given as adjunct treatment, regardless of the individual's state of hydration with the aim of slowing or stopping the sickling process and thereby alleviating pain. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

objectivesTo determine the optimal route, quantity and type of fluid replacement for people with sickle cell disease with acute painful crises. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.We also conducted searches of Embase (November 2007), LILACS and www.ClinicalTrials.gov (05 January 2010).Date of most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 24 September 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the administration of supplemental fluids adjunctive to analgesics by any route in people with any type of sickle cell disease during an acute painful episode, under medical supervision (inpatient, day care or community). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No relevant trials have yet been identified. MAIN

resultsSixteen trials were identified by the searches, all of which were not eligible for inclusion in the review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsTreating vaso-occlusive crises is complex and requires multiple interventions. Extra fluids, generally oral or intravenous, are routinely administered during acute painful episodes to people with sickle cell disease regardless of the individual's state of hydration. Reports of their use during these acute painful episodes do not state the efficacy of any single route, type or quantity of fluid compared to another. However, there are no randomised controlled trials that have assessed the safety and efficacy of different routes, types or quantities of fluid. This systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy and possible adverse effects of different routes, types and quantities of fluid administered to people with sickle cell disease during acute painful episodes.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyAcute PainAnemia, Sickle CellHumansPain Management

Identifiers

PMID25764071
OpenAlexW4249074338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.