ArticleMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2015
Bacterial enteric infections detected by culture-independent diagnostic tests--FoodNet, United States, 2012-2014.
Article in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of Single-Etiology Non-Shiga Toxin-ProducingFood protection trends · 2026Article
- Sources and transmission dynamics ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Percentage of culture confirmation and melting curve analysis reveals false-positiveJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Towards Meaningful Interpretation of Molecular Data: Insights Gained from HMMD Challenges inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Infectious Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Syndromic Gastrointestinal Panel Diagnostic Tests Have Changed our Understanding of the Epidemiology ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of antimicrobial resistance and population structure of gastroenteritis-related Aeromonas isolates.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
- Clinical performance evaluation of TAQPATH Enteric Bacterial Select Panel for the detection of common enteric bacterial pathogens in comparison to routine stool culture and other qPCR-based diagnostic tests.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Engineered bacteria detect tumor DNA.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Impact of Rapid Molecular Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Testing in Management of Children during aJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Accelerating the Detection of Bacteria in Food Using Artificial Intelligence and Optical Imaging.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Shotgun metagenomics of fecal samples from children in Peru reveals frequent complex co-infections with multiple Campylobacter species.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Changing Diagnostic Testing Practices for Foodborne Pathogens, Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 2012-2019.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- A Review of Zoonotic Disease Threats to Pet Owners: A Compendium of Measures to Prevent Zoonotic Diseases Associated with Non-Traditional Pets: Rodents and Other Small Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, Backyard Poultry, and Other Selected Animals.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Is the Medium Still the Message? Culture-Independent Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infections.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Campylobacter sp.: Pathogenicity factors and prevention methods-new molecular targets for innovative antivirulence drugs?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Microfluidic droplet application for bacterial surveillance in fresh-cut produce wash waters.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increased availability and rapid adoption of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) is moving clinical detection of bacterial enteric infections away from culture-based methods. These new tests do not yield isolates that are currently needed for further tests to distinguish among strains or subtypes of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, and other organisms. Public health surveillance relies on this detailed characterization of isolates to monitor trends and rapidly detect outbreaks; consequently, the increased use of CIDTs makes prevention and control of these infections more difficult. During 2012-2013, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet*) identified a total of 38,666 culture-confirmed cases and positive CIDT reports of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, Vibrio, and Yersinia. Among the 5,614 positive CIDT reports, 2,595 (46%) were not confirmed by culture. In addition, a 2014 survey of clinical laboratories serving the FoodNet surveillance area indicated that use of CIDTs by the laboratories varied by pathogen; only CIDT methods were used most often for detection of Campylobacter (10%) and STEC (19%). Maintaining surveillance of bacterial enteric infections in this period of transition will require enhanced surveillance methods and strategies for obtaining bacterial isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25763878PMC5779603W83129370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.