Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25763835›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2015

A two-component 'double-click' approach to peptide stapling.

Yu Heng Lau, Yuteng Wu, Peterson de Andrade, Warren R J D Galloway, David R Spring

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Sydnonimine-based Click-and-Release Approach to Cyclic Products.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Photochemical Methods for Peptide Macrocyclisation.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu Heng LauUniversity Chemical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yuteng WuUniversity Chemical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peterson de AndradeUniversity Chemical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Warren R J D GallowayUniversity Chemical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David R SpringUniversity Chemical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide cyclization is a useful strategy for the stabilization of short flexible peptides into well-defined bioactive conformations, thereby enhancing their ability to interact with proteins and other important biomolecules. We present an optimized procedure for the stabilization of linear diazido peptides in an α-helical conformation upon reaction with dialkynyl linkers under Cu(I) catalysis. As this procedure generates side chain-cyclized peptides bearing a bis-triazole linkage, it is referred to as 'double-click' stapling. Double-click stapling can enhance the binding affinity, proteolytic stability and cellular activity of a peptide inhibitor. A distinguishing feature of double-click stapling is the efficiency with which peptides bearing different staple linkages can be synthesized, thus allowing for modular control over peptide bioactivity. This protocol describes the double-click reaction between a 1,3-dialkynylbenzene linker and peptides that contain azidoornithine. Subsequent peptide purification and confirmation steps are also described. The entire double-click stapling protocol can be completed in ∼48 h, including two overnight lyophilization steps.

Indexed as

Chemistry Techniques, SyntheticChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCyclizationPeptidesProtein ConformationProtein StabilitySolventsPeptidesSolvents

Identifiers

PMID25763835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.