Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25763395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of reproductive medicine2014

An audit of indications, complications, and justification of hysterectomies at a teaching hospital in India.

Deeksha Pandey, Kriti Sehgal, Aashish Saxena, Shripad Hebbar, Jayaram Nambiar, Rajeshwari G Bhat

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of reproductive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An audit of hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India: Story of a decade.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deeksha PandeyDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, 4/1 KMC Flats, KMC Campus, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8434-3961
Kriti SehgalDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, 4/1 KMC Flats, KMC Campus, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Aashish SaxenaKMC Manipal, Manipal University, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-2828
Shripad HebbarDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, 4/1 KMC Flats, KMC Campus, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Jayaram NambiarDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, 4/1 KMC Flats, KMC Campus, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Rajeshwari G BhatDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, 4/1 KMC Flats, KMC Campus, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. Aim of this audit was to analyze indications, complications, and correlation of preoperative diagnosis with final histopathology report of all hysterectomies, performed in a premier teaching hospital. Methods. Present study involved all patients who underwent hysterectomy at a premier university hospital in Southern India, in one year (from 1 January, 2012, to 31 December, 2012). Results. Most common surgical approach was abdominal (74.7%), followed by vaginal (17.8%), and laparoscopic (6.6%) hysterectomy. Most common indication for hysterectomy was symptomatic fibroid uterus (39.9%), followed by uterovaginal prolapse (16.3%). Overall complication rate was 8.5%. Around 84% had the same pathology as suspected preoperatively. Only 6 (5 with preoperative diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding and one with high grade premalignant cervical lesion) had no significant pathology in their hysterectomy specimen. Conclusion. Hysterectomy is used commonly to improve the quality of life; however at times it is a lifesaving procedure. As any surgical procedure is associated with a risk of complications, the indication should be carefully evaluated. With the emergence of many conservative approaches to deal with benign gynecological conditions, it is prudent to discuss available options with the patient before taking a direct decision of surgically removing her uterus.

Identifiers

PMID25763395
PMCPMC4334049
OpenAlexW2084272410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.