Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25763369›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

Analysis of genetic variation and potential applications in genome-scale metabolic modeling.

João G R Cardoso, Mikael Rørdam Andersen, Markus J Herrgård, Nikolaus Sonnenschein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of salinity resistance and combining ability analysis in the seedlings of mulberry hybrids (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Systems Biology on Acetogenic Bacteria for Utilizing C1 Feedstocks.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Constraint-based modeling in microbial food biotechnology.Biochemical Society transactions · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Editorial: Current Challenges in Modeling Cellular Metabolism.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João G R CardosoThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center of Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark , Hørsholm , Denmark.
Mikael Rørdam AndersenDepartment of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark , Lyngby , Denmark.
Markus J HerrgårdThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center of Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark , Hørsholm , Denmark.
Nikolaus SonnenscheinThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center of Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark , Hørsholm , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation is the motor of evolution and allows organisms to overcome the environmental challenges they encounter. It can be both beneficial and harmful in the process of engineering cell factories for the production of proteins and chemicals. Throughout the history of biotechnology, there have been efforts to exploit genetic variation in our favor to create strains with favorable phenotypes. Genetic variation can either be present in natural populations or it can be artificially created by mutagenesis and selection or adaptive laboratory evolution. On the other hand, unintended genetic variation during a long term production process may lead to significant economic losses and it is important to understand how to control this type of variation. With the emergence of next-generation sequencing technologies, genetic variation in microbial strains can now be determined on an unprecedented scale and resolution by re-sequencing thousands of strains systematically. In this article, we review challenges in the integration and analysis of large-scale re-sequencing data, present an extensive overview of bioinformatics methods for predicting the effects of genetic variants on protein function, and discuss approaches for interfacing existing bioinformatics approaches with genome-scale models of cellular processes in order to predict effects of sequence variation on cellular phenotypes.

Indexed as

adaptive laboratory evolutionconstraint-based modelinggenetic variationhigh-throughput analysismetabolic engineeringmetabolismnext-generation sequencingSNP

Identifiers

PMID25763369
PMCPMC4329917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.