Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25763074›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society2014

Does magnetic resonance imaging affect the microleakage of amalgam restorations?

Ozlem Marti Akgun, Gunseli Guven Polat, Ahmet Turan Illca, Ceren Yildirim, Pervin Demir, Feridun Basak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MRI in Dentistry- A Future Towards Radiation Free Imaging - Systematic Review.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016
    Review
  5. Designing of a Computer Software for Detection of Approximal Caries in Posterior Teeth.Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ozlem Marti AkgunDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Gunseli Guven PolatDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Turan IllcaDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Mevki Military Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Ceren YildirimDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Pervin DemirDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Feridun BasakDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRIzmir University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations is an important health issue that should be considered. If MRI application causes increase of microleakage, amalgam fillings should be reassessed after MRI and replaced if necessary.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on microleakage of class II bonded amalgam versus classical amalgam restorations. MATERIALS AND

methodsClass II cavities (3 mm width × 1.5 mm depth) with gingival margins ending 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) were prepared in 40 permanent molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups. Cavities in the first and second groups were restored with dentin adhesive and amalgam (bonded amalgam), and those in the third and fourth groups with amalgam only. MRI was performed with the teeth specimens from the first and third groups. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5° to 55° C with a 30-second dwell time for 1000 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and sectioned longitudinally. Dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins was quantified by 15× stereomicroscopy. IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2012., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and MS-Excel 2007 programs were used for statistical analyses and calculations. "nparLD" module was used for F2_LD_F1 design analysis at R program. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsIn teeth with amalgam filling, there were no significant differences of occlusal and gingival surface microleakage after MRI exposure. Occlusal and gingival surface microleakages were also similar with and without MRI in teeth with bonded amalgam filling.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that MRI does not increase microleakage of amalgam restorations.

Indexed as

Dental AmalgamMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroleakage

Identifiers

PMID25763074
PMCPMC4341166
OpenAlexW2066171057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.