Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Allocentric spatial learning and memory deficits in Down syndrome.

Pamela Banta Lavenex, Mathilde Bostelmann, Catherine Brandner, Floriana Costanzo, Emilie Fragnière, Giuliana Klencklen, Pierre Lavenex, Deny Menghini, Stefano Vicari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visuospatial perspective taking in people with Down syndrome.Research in developmental disabilities · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela Banta LavenexLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mathilde BostelmannLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine BrandnerLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Floriana CostanzoDepartment of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital Rome, Italy.
Emilie FragnièreLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giuliana KlencklenLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pierre LavenexLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Deny MenghiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital Rome, Italy.
Stefano VicariDepartment of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have shown that persons with Down syndrome (DS) exhibit relatively poor language capacities, and impaired verbal and visuoperceptual memory, whereas their visuospatial memory capacities appear comparatively spared. Individuals with DS recall better where an object was previously seen than what object was previously seen. However, most of the evidence concerning preserved visuospatial memory comes from tabletop or computerized experiments which are biased toward testing egocentric (viewpoint-dependent) spatial representations. Accordingly, allocentric (viewpoint-independent) spatial learning and memory capacities may not be necessary to perform these tasks. Thus, in order to more fully characterize the spatial capacities of individuals with DS, allocentric processes underlying real-world navigation must also be investigated. We tested 20 participants with DS and 16 mental age-matched, typically developing (TD) children in a real-world, allocentric spatial (AS) memory task. During local cue (LC) trials, participants had to locate three rewards marked by local color cues, among 12 locations distributed in a 4 m × 4 m arena. During AS trials, participants had to locate the same three rewards, in absence of LCs, based on their relations to distal environmental cues. All TD participants chose rewarded locations in LC and AS trials at above chance level. In contrast, although all but one of the participants with DS exhibited a preference for the rewarded locations in LC trials, only 50% of participants with DS chose the rewarded locations at above chance level in AS trials. As a group, participants with DS performed worse than TD children on all measures of task performance. These findings demonstrate that individuals with DS are impaired at using an AS representation to learn and remember discrete locations in a controlled environment, suggesting persistent and pervasive deficits in hippocampus-dependent memory in DS.

Indexed as

capacityepisodicgenetic disorderhippocampusmemoryresolution

Identifiers

PMID25762946
PMCPMC4329802
OpenAlexW2004998498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.