ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015
Allocentric spatial learning and memory deficits in Down syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Review
- Unbiased analysis of spatial learning strategies in a modified Barnes maze using convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dissecting the contribution of human chromosome 21 syntenic regions to recognition memory processes in adult and aged mouse models of Down syndrome.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Extended trajectory of spatial memory errors in typical and atypical development: The role of binding and precision.Hippocampus · 2023Article
- Visuospatial perspective taking in people with Down syndrome.Research in developmental disabilities · 2023Article
- Article
- Signalling pathways contributing to learning and memory deficits in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.Neuronal signaling · 2021Review
- A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Article
- Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping Capacities in Down and Williams Syndromes.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Path Learning in Individuals With Down Syndrome: The Floor Matrix Task and the Role of Individual Visuo-Spatial Measures.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Small Sets of Novel Words Are Fully Retained After 1-Week in Typically Developing Children and Down Syndrome: A Fast Mapping Study.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2018Article
- Article
- Memory profiles in Down syndrome across development: a review of memory abilities through the lifespan.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2018Review
- Low-Resolution Place and Response Learning Capacities in Down Syndrome.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Profiles of Cognitive-Motor Interference During Walking in Children: Does the Motor or the Cognitive Task Matter?Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- The medial temporal memory system in Down syndrome: Translating animal models of hippocampal compromise.Hippocampus · 2017Article
- Tc1 mouse model of trisomy-21 dissociates properties of short- and long-term recognition memory.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2016Article
- Building an adaptive brain across development: targets for neurorehabilitation must begin in infancy.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have shown that persons with Down syndrome (DS) exhibit relatively poor language capacities, and impaired verbal and visuoperceptual memory, whereas their visuospatial memory capacities appear comparatively spared. Individuals with DS recall better where an object was previously seen than what object was previously seen. However, most of the evidence concerning preserved visuospatial memory comes from tabletop or computerized experiments which are biased toward testing egocentric (viewpoint-dependent) spatial representations. Accordingly, allocentric (viewpoint-independent) spatial learning and memory capacities may not be necessary to perform these tasks. Thus, in order to more fully characterize the spatial capacities of individuals with DS, allocentric processes underlying real-world navigation must also be investigated. We tested 20 participants with DS and 16 mental age-matched, typically developing (TD) children in a real-world, allocentric spatial (AS) memory task. During local cue (LC) trials, participants had to locate three rewards marked by local color cues, among 12 locations distributed in a 4 m × 4 m arena. During AS trials, participants had to locate the same three rewards, in absence of LCs, based on their relations to distal environmental cues. All TD participants chose rewarded locations in LC and AS trials at above chance level. In contrast, although all but one of the participants with DS exhibited a preference for the rewarded locations in LC trials, only 50% of participants with DS chose the rewarded locations at above chance level in AS trials. As a group, participants with DS performed worse than TD children on all measures of task performance. These findings demonstrate that individuals with DS are impaired at using an AS representation to learn and remember discrete locations in a controlled environment, suggesting persistent and pervasive deficits in hippocampus-dependent memory in DS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.