Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762905›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2015

Visual-auditory integration for visual search: a behavioral study in barn owls.

Yael Hazan, Yonatan Kra, Inna Yarin, Hermann Wagner, Yoram Gutfreund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emergence of an Adaptive Command for Orienting Behavior in Premotor Brainstem Neurons of Barn Owls.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  5. Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates of Perceptual Grouping by Motion in the Barn Owl.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Responses to Pop-Out Stimuli in the Barn Owl's Optic Tectum Can Emerge through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yael HazanDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion Haifa, Israel.
Yonatan KraDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion Haifa, Israel.
Inna YarinDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion Haifa, Israel.
Hermann WagnerDepartment of Zoology and Animal Physiology, Institute for Biology II, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany.
Yoram GutfreundDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barn owls are nocturnal predators that rely on both vision and hearing for survival. The optic tectum of barn owls, a midbrain structure involved in selective attention, has been used as a model for studying visual-auditory integration at the neuronal level. However, behavioral data on visual-auditory integration in barn owls are lacking. The goal of this study was to examine if the integration of visual and auditory signals contributes to the process of guiding attention toward salient stimuli. We attached miniature wireless video cameras on barn owls' heads (OwlCam) to track their target of gaze. We first provide evidence that the area centralis (a retinal area with a maximal density of photoreceptors) is used as a functional fovea in barn owls. Thus, by mapping the projection of the area centralis on the OwlCam's video frame, it is possible to extract the target of gaze. For the experiment, owls were positioned on a high perch and four food items were scattered in a large arena on the floor. In addition, a hidden loudspeaker was positioned in the arena. The positions of the food items and speaker were changed every session. Video sequences from the OwlCam were saved for offline analysis while the owls spontaneously scanned the room and the food items with abrupt gaze shifts (head saccades). From time to time during the experiment, a brief sound was emitted from the speaker. The fixation points immediately following the sounds were extracted and the distances between the gaze position and the nearest items and loudspeaker were measured. The head saccades were rarely toward the location of the sound source but to salient visual features in the room, such as the door knob or the food items. However, among the food items, the one closest to the loudspeaker had the highest probability of attracting a gaze shift. This result supports the notion that auditory signals are integrated with visual information for the selection of the next visual search target.

Indexed as

barn owlsmultisensorysaccadessaliencyselective attentionsound localizationvisual search

Identifiers

PMID25762905
PMCPMC4327738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.