ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015
What will this do to me and my brain? Ethical issues in brain-to-brain interfacing.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Media Representation of the Ethical Issues Pertaining to Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Technology.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Decentralising the Self - Ethical Considerations in Utilizing Decentralised Web Technology for Direct Brain Interfaces.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Factors influencing the social acceptance of brain-computer interface technology among Chinese general public: an exploratory study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Merging Minds: The Conceptual and Ethical Impacts of Emerging Technologies for Collective Minds.Neuroethics · 2023Article
- Article
- An optical brain-to-brain interface supports rapid information transmission for precise locomotion control.Science China. Life sciences · 2020Article
- Wired Emotions: Ethical Issues of Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human "Intelligent BCI" Trial.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Multi-Person Brain-To-Brain Interfaces: Ethical Issues.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
- Future think: cautiously optimistic about brain augmentation using tissue engineering and machine interface.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent brain-to-brain interfacing studies provide proof of principle for the feasibility of various forms of direct information transfer between two brains, and may lead to the development of new approaches involving memory, emotions, or senses. What makes brain-to-brain interfaces unique is the transfer of information representing specific messages directly from one brain to another, without involving any activity of the peripheral nervous system or senses. The article discusses ethical issues that arise in neural interfacing. The focus is on the implications that brain-to-brain interfaces may have on the individual at the recipient side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.