ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
Evaluation of Off-label Prescribing at a Children's Rehabilitation Center.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Off‑label and unapproved pediatric drug utilization: A meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Off-Label Prescribing in Pediatric Population-Literature Review for 2012-2022.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Off-label Medications Use in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: The Views of General Practitioners, Pediatricians, and Other Specialists.Hospital pharmacy · 2020Article
- Serious Adverse Drug Reactions and Safety Signals in Children: A Nationwide Database Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Article
- Two decades of off-label prescribing in children: a literature review.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2018Review
- Off-label drugs use in pediatric palliative care.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was developed to evaluate the incidence of off-label prescribing at a pediatric rehabilitation center. Secondary objectives were to describe the medications, patient age groups, and diagnoses most often associated with off-label prescribing.
methodsThis was a prospective observational study conducted at an academic, inpatient children's rehabilitation center from November 11, 2011, to April 1, 2012. Patients younger than 16 years of age who received at least 1 prescription medication were included. Data were collected from the patients' electronic medical records.
resultsA total of 240 medications orders were placed during the study, with 57% written off-label. Thirty-five patients (88%) received at least 1 off-label medication. Forty-nine percent of the orders were for patients younger than the approved range, with 48% written for an unapproved indication, 2% for an alternative route of administration, and 1% for an unapproved age and indication. Children 2 to 12 years of age received 40% of the off-label orders, followed by adolescents with 37%. The therapeutic classes most often prescribed off-label were central nervous system agents and anti-infectives.
conclusionOff-label prescribing was found in the majority of children receiving rehabilitative services, a rate as high or higher than that reported in pediatric acute care or clinic settings. The medications prescribed off-label most often were central nervous system agents, reflecting the need to study medications in the chronic rehabilitation population to optimize function in children with brain or spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.