Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762818›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Measuring anti-factor xa activity to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin in obesity: a critical review.

Gregory Egan, Mary H H Ensom

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Therapeutic Enoxaparin Dosing in Obesity.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Low-molecular-weight heparins for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A systematic literature review of efficacy and cost-effectiveness.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Weight-adjusted dosing of tinzaparin for thromboprophylaxis in obese medical patients.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  18. An Overview of Heparin Monitoring with the Anti-Xa Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory EganBScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, is a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Neurology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Mary H H EnsomBS(Pharm), PharmD, FASHP, FCCP, FCSHP, FCAHS, is a Professor in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Distinguished University Scholar, The University of British Columbia, and a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. She is also the Editor of the CJHP .
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe choice of whether to monitor anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity in patients who are obese and who are receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is controversial. To the authors' knowledge, no systematic review of monitoring of anti-Xa activity in such patients has been published to date.

objectiveTo systematically ascertain the utility of monitoring anti-Xa concentrations for LMWH therapy in obese patients. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1946 to September 2014), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase (1974 to September 2014), PubMed (1947 to September 2014), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to September 2014), and Scopus were searched using the terms obesity, morbid obesity, thrombosis, venous thrombosis, embolism, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, low-molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, anti-factor Xa, anti-factor Xa monitoring, anti-factor Xa activity, and anti-factor Xa assay. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language studies describing obese patients treated with LMWH or reporting anti-Xa activity were reviewed using a 9-step decision-making algorithm to determine whether monitoring of LMWH therapy by means of anti-Xa activity in obesity is warranted. Studies published in abstract form were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: The analysis showed that anti-Xa concentrations are not strongly associated with thrombosis or hemorrhage. In clinical studies of LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and medical patients, and for treatment of venous thrombo embolism and acute coronary syndrome, anti-Xa activity can be predicted from dose of LMWH and total body weight; no difference in clinical outcome was found between obese and non-obese participants.

conclusionsRoutinely determining anti-Xa concentrations in obese patients to monitor the clinical effectiveness of LMWH is not warranted on the basis of the current evidence. Circumstances where measurement of anti-Xa concentration may help in clinical decision-making in either obese or non-obese patients would be cases where elimination of LMWH is impaired or there is an unexpected clinical response, as well as to confirm compliance with therapy or to identify deviation from predicted pharmacokinetics.

Indexed as

anti–factor Xaanti-Xalow-molecular-weight heparintherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID25762818
PMCPMC4350497
OpenAlexW1965534922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.