Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762663›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Differential combinatorial coding of pheromones in two olfactory subsystems of the honey bee brain.

Julie Carcaud, Martin Giurfa, Jean-Christophe Sandoz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Neuronal Response Latencies Encode First Odor Identity Information across Subjects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie CarcaudEvolution, Genomes, Behavior and Ecology Lab, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, IRD (UMR 9191), F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, Research Center on Animal Cognition, Université de Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France, and Research Center on Animal Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Martin GiurfaResearch Center on Animal Cognition, Université de Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France, and Research Center on Animal Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Jean-Christophe SandozEvolution, Genomes, Behavior and Ecology Lab, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, IRD (UMR 9191), F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, sandoz@egce.cnrs-gif.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-9645
Université Paris-Sud · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural coding of pheromones has been intensively studied in insects with a particular focus on sex pheromones. These studies favored the view that pheromone compounds are processed within specific antennal lobe glomeruli following a specialized labeled-line system. However, pheromones play crucial roles in an insect's life beyond sexual attraction, and some species use many different pheromones making such a labeled-line organization unrealistic. A combinatorial coding scheme, in which each component activates a set of broadly tuned units, appears more adapted in this case. However, this idea has not been tested thoroughly. We focused here on the honey bee Apis mellifera, a social insect that relies on a wide range of pheromones to ensure colony cohesion. Interestingly, the honey bee olfactory system harbors two central parallel pathways, whose functions remain largely unknown. Using optophysiological recordings of projection neurons, we compared the responses of these two pathways to 27 known honey bee pheromonal compounds emitted by the brood, the workers, and the queen. We show that while queen mandibular pheromone is processed by l-ALT (lateral antennal lobe tract) neurons and brood pheromone is mainly processed by m-ALT (median antennal lobe tract) neurons, worker pheromones induce redundant activity in both pathways. Moreover, all tested pheromonal compounds induce combinatorial activity from several AL glomeruli. These findings support the combinatorial coding scheme and suggest that higher-order brain centers reading out these combinatorial activity patterns may eventually classify olfactory signals according to their biological meaning.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeBeesBrainCalciumFemaleNerve NetOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOptics and PhotonicsOrientationPheromonesSensory Receptor CellsSmellSocial BehaviorCalciumPheromonesinsectolfactionoptical imagingparallel processingpheromone

Identifiers

PMID25762663
PMCPMC6605296
OpenAlexW2060326474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.