Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762530›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2015

Prevention of chemically induced urinary bladder cancers by naproxen: protocols to reduce gastric toxicity in humans do not alter preventive efficacy.

Ronald A Lubet, James M Scheiman, Ann Bode, Jonathan White, Lori Minasian, M Margaret Juliana, Daniel L Boring, Vernon E Steele, Clinton J Grubbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cancer Chemoprevention: Preclinical In Vivo Alternate Dosing Strategies to Reduce Drug Toxicities.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald A LubetDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
James M ScheimanDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ann BodeHormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, Minnesota.
Jonathan WhiteMidwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Lori MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
M Margaret JulianaDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Daniel L BoringDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Vernon E SteeleDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clinton J GrubbsDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. clintongrubbs@uabmc.edu.
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USHormel (United States) · USMRIGlobal · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01 CN043301NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-43301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COX inhibitors (NSAID/Coxibs) are a major focus for the chemoprevention of cancer. The COX-2-specific inhibitors have progressed to clinical trials and have shown preventive efficacy in colon and skin cancers. However, they have significant adverse cardiovascular effects. Certain NSAIDs (e.g., naproxen) have a good cardiac profile, but can cause gastric toxicity. The present study examined protocols to reduce this toxicity of naproxen. Female Fischer-344 rats were treated weekly with the urinary bladder-specific carcinogen hydroxybutyl(butyl)nitrosamine (OH-BBN) for 8 weeks. Rats were dosed daily with NPX (40 mg/kg body weight/day, gavage) or with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole (4.0 mg/kg body weight/day) either singly or in combination beginning 2 weeks after the final OH-BBN. OH-BBN-treated rats, 96% developed urinary bladder cancers. While omeprazole alone was ineffective (97% cancers), naproxen alone or combined with omeprazole-prevented cancers, yielding 27 and 35% cancers, respectively. In a separate study, OH-BBN -: treated rats were administered naproxen: (A) daily, (B) 1 week daily naproxen/1week vehicle, (C) 3 weeks daily naproxen/3 week vehicle, or (D) daily vehicle beginning 2 weeks after last OH-BBN treatment. In the intermittent dosing study, protocol A, B, C, and D resulted in palpable cancers in 27%, 22%, 19%, and 96% of rats (P < 0.01). Short-term naproxen treatment increased apoptosis, but did not alter proliferation in the urinary bladder cancers. Two different protocols that should decrease the gastric toxicity of NSAIDs in humans did not alter chemopreventive efficacy. This should encourage the use of NSAIDs (e.g., naproxen) in clinical prevention trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBlotting, WesternButylhydroxybutylnitrosamineCarcinogensFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMiceNaproxenRatsRats, Inbred F344StomachUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalButylhydroxybutylnitrosamineCarcinogensNaproxen

Identifiers

PMID25762530
PMCPMC4383706
OpenAlexW2079768392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.