Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762420›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor protocols2015

Using the ENCODE Resource for Functional Annotation of Genetic Variants.

Michael J Pazin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Into the Wild: GWAS Exploration of Non-coding RNAs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. A functional SNP upstream of theInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael J PazinDivision of Genome Sciences, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article illustrates the use of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) resource to generate or refine hypotheses from genomic data on disease and other phenotypic traits. First, the goals and history of ENCODE and related epigenomics projects are reviewed. Second, the rationale for ENCODE and the major data types used by ENCODE are briefly described, as are some standard heuristics for their interpretation. Third, the use of the ENCODE resource is examined. Standard use cases for ENCODE, accessing the ENCODE resource, and accessing data from related projects are discussed. Although the focus of this article is the use of ENCODE data, some of the same approaches can be used with data from other projects.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticEpigenomicsGenetic VariationGenome, HumanAnimalsGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID25762420
PMCPMC4521767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.