Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762318›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

C-fiber recovery cycle supernormality depends on ion concentration and ion channel permeability.

Jenny Tigerholm, Marcus E Petersson, Otilia Obreja, Esther Eberhardt, Barbara Namer, Christian Weidner, Angelika Lampert, Richard W Carr, Martin Schmelz, Erik Fransén

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Shaping the Action Potential in Dorsal Root and Trigeminal Ganglia Neurons: Relevance to Pain Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multitarget nociceptor sensitization by a promiscuous peptide from the venom of the King Baboon spider.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenny TigerholmDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Brain Institute, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus E PeterssonDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Brain Institute, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Otilia ObrejaAnaesthesiology, Universitaetsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Esther EberhardtInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Barbara NamerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christian WeidnerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Angelika LampertInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Institute of Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Richard W CarrAnaesthesiology, Universitaetsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Martin SchmelzAnaesthesiology, Universitaetsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Erik FransénDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Brain Institute, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: erikf@csc.kth.se.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following each action potential, C-fiber nociceptors undergo cyclical changes in excitability, including a period of superexcitability, before recovering their basal excitability state. The increase in superexcitability during this recovery cycle depends upon their immediate firing history of the axon, but also determines the instantaneous firing frequency that encodes pain intensity. To explore the mechanistic underpinnings of the recovery cycle phenomenon a biophysical model of a C-fiber has been developed. The model represents the spatial extent of the axon including its passive properties as well as ion channels and the Na/K-ATPase ion pump. Ionic concentrations were represented inside and outside the membrane. The model was able to replicate the typical transitions in excitability from subnormal to supernormal observed empirically following a conducted action potential. In the model, supernormality depended on the degree of conduction slowing which in turn depends upon the frequency of stimulation, in accordance with experimental findings. In particular, we show that activity-dependent conduction slowing is produced by the accumulation of intraaxonal sodium. We further show that the supernormal phase results from a reduced potassium current Kdr as a result of accumulation of periaxonal potassium in concert with a reduced influx of sodium through Nav1.7 relative to Nav1.8 current. This theoretical prediction was supported by data from an in vitro preparation of small rat dorsal root ganglion somata showing a reduction in the magnitude of tetrodotoxin-sensitive relative to tetrodotoxin -resistant whole cell current. Furthermore, our studies provide support for the role of depolarization in supernormality, as previously suggested, but we suggest that the basic mechanism depends on changes in ionic concentrations inside and outside the axon. The understanding of the mechanisms underlying repetitive discharges in recovery cycles may provide insight into mechanisms of spontaneous activity, which recently has been shown to correlate to a perceived level of pain.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAxonsCell Membrane PermeabilityHumansNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedPotassiumPotassium ChannelsSodiumSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelsPotassiumPotassium ChannelsSodiumSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseVoltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID25762318
PMCPMC4816283
OpenAlexW2078599635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.