Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762232›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial.

E Shaw, J M Miró, M Puig-Asensio, C Pigrau, F Barcenilla, J Murillas, G Garcia-Pardo, E Espejo, B Padilla, A Garcia-Reyne and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01898338 (Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Monotherapy for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01898338 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Monotherapy for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMiquel PujolRan2013 to 2018Enrolled167ConditionsStaph Aureus Methicillin Resistant BacteremiaArmsFosfomycin 2gr/6h iv, Daptomycin 10mg/kg/24h iv
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A case study onJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Fosfomycin in antimicrobial stewardship programs.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  9. New evidence on the use of fosfomycin for bacteremia and infectious endocarditis.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  10. New perspectives for reassessing fosfomycin: applicability in current clinical practice.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fosfomycin.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

E ShawHospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
J M MiróHospital Universitari Clínic-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
M Puig-AsensioHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
C PigrauHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
F BarcenillaHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
J MurillasHospital Universitari Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain.
G Garcia-PardoHospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
E EspejoHospital Universitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
B PadillaHospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
A Garcia-ReyneHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
J PasquauHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
J Rodriguez-BañoHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
J López-ContrerasHospital Universitari Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
M MonteroHospital Universitari Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
C de la CalleHospital Universitari Clínic-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
V PintadoHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
E CalboHospital Universitari Mutúa de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
O GaschCorporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
M MontejoHospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.
M SalavertHospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
M J Garcia-PaisHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.
J CarratalàHospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
M PujolHospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
GEIH (Hospital Infection Study Group)
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Terrassa · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Universitari de Vic · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESMútua Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the availability of new antibiotics such as daptomycin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia continues to be associated with high clinical failure rates. Combination therapy has been proposed as an alternative to improve outcomes but there is a lack of clinical studies. The study aims to demonstrate that combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin achieves higher clinical success rates in the treatment of MRSA bacteraemia than daptomycin alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre open-label, randomised phase III study. Adult patients hospitalised with MRSA bacteraemia will be randomly assigned (1:1) to group 1: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous; or group 2: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous plus fosfomycin 2 gr/6 g intravenous. The main outcome will be treatment response at week 6 after stopping therapy (test-of-cure (TOC) visit). This is a composite variable with two values: Treatment success: resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (clinical success) and negative blood cultures (microbiological success) at the TOC visit. Treatment failure: if any of the following conditions apply: (1) lack of clinical improvement at 72 h or more after starting therapy; (2) persistent bacteraemia (positive blood cultures on day 7); (3) therapy is discontinued early due to adverse effects or for some other reason based on clinical judgement; (4) relapse of MRSA bacteraemia before the TOC visit; (5) death for any reason before the TOC visit. Assuming a 60% cure rate with daptomycin and a 20% difference in cure rates between the two groups, 103 patients will be needed for each group (α:0.05, ß: 0.2). Statistical analysis will be based on intention to treat, as well as per protocol and safety analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (AEMPS). The sponsor commits itself to publishing the data in first quartile peer-review journals within 12 months of the completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01898338.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDaptomycinDrug CombinationsFosfomycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsResearch DesignStaphylococcal InfectionsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinDrug CombinationsFosfomycinbacteraemiacombination therapydaptomycinfosfomycinmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Identifiers

PMID25762232
PMCPMC4360784
OpenAlexW2111080652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.