ArticleBMJ open2015
Evidence-based development of a post-surgical lumbar discectomy leaflet intervention: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Physiotherapy Post Lumbar Discectomy: Prospective Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Article
- Bracing and Activity Restriction After Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: An International Survey of AO Spine Members.Neurospine · 2026Article
- Preparing for cognitive behavioural therapy: a Delphi exercise to develop a consensus curriculum.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Development of pain science education for chronic low back pain in India.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025Article
- Physical therapy of patients undergoing first-time lumbar discectomy: a survey of current UK practice.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Article
- Influence of Early Intensive Rehabilitation on Functional Mobility after Low Back Surgery.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo produce free, expert-informed postoperative information for lumbar discectomy patients, satisfying UK National Health Service Information Standards.
designA mixed methods approach utilising the Delphi technique and focus groups.
settingFive spinal centres across the UK.
participantsPanel members included 23 physiotherapists, 11 patients and 17 spinal surgeons.
interventionThree rounds of questionnaires including open and closed questions and attendance at a clinician/patient focus group.
resultsResponse rates of 85%, 26% and 35% were achieved for the Delphi rounds. Ten clinicians and six patients participated in the focus groups. Consensus for leaflet sections was achieved in round 1 and content in round 3. The focus groups informed further revisions.
conclusionsA consensually agreed, Information Standard compliant, patient lumbar discectomy leaflet was produced containing: (1) normal spine anatomy; (2) anatomy disc herniation and surgery; (3) back protection strategies and (4) frequently asked questions. Illustrations of exercises enable tailoring to the individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.