Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25762217›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Natural yeast promoter variants reveal epistasis in the generation of transcriptional-mediated noise and its potential benefit in stressful conditions.

Jian Liu, Hélène Martin-Yken, Frédéric Bigey, Sylvie Dequin, Jean-Marie François, Jean-Pascal Capp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mGenome biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Genomic Adaptations ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  10. Genomic Adaptation ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biological Parts forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. AFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jian LiuLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés, UMR CNRS 5504, UMR INRA 792, INSA/Université de Toulouse, France.
Hélène Martin-YkenLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés, UMR CNRS 5504, UMR INRA 792, INSA/Université de Toulouse, France.
Frédéric BigeyINRA, UMR 1083 Sciences Pour l'Œnologie, Montpellier, France.
Sylvie DequinINRA, UMR 1083 Sciences Pour l'Œnologie, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Marie FrançoisLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés, UMR CNRS 5504, UMR INRA 792, INSA/Université de Toulouse, France.
Jean-Pascal CappLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés, UMR CNRS 5504, UMR INRA 792, INSA/Université de Toulouse, France capp@insa-toulouse.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSciences pour L’Œnologie · FRLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Biologiques et des Procédés · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in phenotypic variability through gene expression noise is proposed to be an evolutionary strategy in selective environments. Differences in promoter-mediated noise between Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains could have been selected for thanks to the benefit conferred by gene expression heterogeneity in the stressful conditions, for instance, those experienced by industrial strains. Here, we used a genome-wide approach to identify promoters conferring high noise levels in the industrial wine strain EC1118. Many promoters of genes related to environmental factors were identified, some of them containing genetic variations compared with their counterpart in the laboratory strain S288c. Each variant of eight promoters has been fused to yeast-Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein and integrated in the genome of both strains. Some industrial variants conferred higher expression associated, as expected, with lower noise, but other variants either increased or decreased expression without modifying variability, so that they might exhibit different levels of transcriptional-mediated noise at equal mean. At different induction conditions giving similar expression for both variants of the CUP1 promoter, we indeed observed higher noise with the industrial variant. Nevertheless, this difference was only observed in the industrial strain, revealing epistasis in the generation of promoter-mediated noise. Moreover, the increased expression variability conferred by this natural yeast promoter variant provided a clear benefit in the face of an environmental stress. Thus, modulation of gene expression noise by a combination of promoter modifications and trans-influences might be a possible adaptation mechanism in yeast.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenetic VariationPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticCopperGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStress, PhysiologicalCoppercopperindustrial wine yeastphenotypic variability and heterogeneitystochastic gene expressionstress resistance and tolerance

Identifiers

PMID25762217
PMCPMC4419794
OpenAlexW2112599840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.