ArticleNature2015
Lineage correlations of single cell division time as a probe of cell-cycle dynamics.
Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lineage topology, replication kinetics and cell cycle synchronization reveal regulated growth dynamics in human bone marrow stromal cell colonies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inheritance entropy: A model-independent method to probe the hereditary structure of cell lineage trees.PRX life · 2026Article
- Label-Free Longitudinal Imaging of Single Cell Drug Response with a 3D-Printed Cell Culture Platform.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- A common pathway controls cell size in the sepal and leaf epidermis leading to a nonrandom pattern of giant cells.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Subtle alteration in transcriptional memory governs the lineage-level cell cycle duration heterogeneities of mammalian cells.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Combining lineage correlations and a small molecule inhibitor to detect circadian control of the cell cycle.iScience · 2025Article
- Genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screening reveals the role ofmSphere · 2025Article
- Cell cycle visualization tools to study cardiomyocyte proliferation in real-time.Open biology · 2024Review
- A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Collective effects of cell cleavage dynamics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Chaos in a bacterial stress response.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Modeling the Circadian Control of the Cell Cycle and Its Consequences for Cancer Chronotherapy.Biology · 2023Article
- Modeling Cellular Signaling Variability Based on Single-Cell Data: The TGFβ-SMAD Signaling Pathway.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Machine learning enhanced cell tracking.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- The fate of notch-1 transcript is linked to cell cycle dynamics by activity of a natural antisense transcript.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Imaging developmental cell cycles.Biophysical journal · 2021Review
- Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stochastic processes in cells are associated with fluctuations in mRNA, protein production and degradation, noisy partition of cellular components at division, and other cell processes. Variability within a clonal population of cells originates from such stochastic processes, which may be amplified or reduced by deterministic factors. Cell-to-cell variability, such as that seen in the heterogeneous response of bacteria to antibiotics, or of cancer cells to treatment, is understood as the inevitable consequence of stochasticity. Variability in cell-cycle duration was observed long ago; however, its sources are still unknown. A central question is whether the variance of the observed distribution originates from stochastic processes, or whether it arises mostly from a deterministic process that only appears to be random. A surprising feature of cell-cycle-duration inheritance is that it seems to be lost within one generation but to be still present in the next generation, generating poor correlation between mother and daughter cells but high correlation between cousin cells. This observation suggests the existence of underlying deterministic factors that determine the main part of cell-to-cell variability. We developed an experimental system that precisely measures the cell-cycle duration of thousands of mammalian cells along several generations and a mathematical framework that allows discrimination between stochastic and deterministic processes in lineages of cells. We show that the inter- and intra-generation correlations reveal complex inheritance of the cell-cycle duration. Finally, we build a deterministic nonlinear toy model for cell-cycle inheritance that reproduces the main features of our data. Our approach constitutes a general method to identify deterministic variability in lineages of cells or organisms, which may help to predict and, eventually, reduce cell-to-cell heterogeneity in various systems, such as cancer cells under treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.