ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2015
Evaluation of 98 immunocompetent children with cytomegalovirus infection: importance of neurodevelopmental follow-up.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytomegalovirus-Associated Thrombocytopenia in an Immunocompetent Infant: A Case Report.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Clinical Manifestations of Non-Congenital CMV Infection in Infants and Immunocompetent Children: Review of Cases from the Past Decade.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Mechanisms involved in the development of thrombocytopenia in patients with COVID-19.Thrombosis research · 2020Review
- Clinical characteristics and treatment courses for cytomegalovirus-associated thrombocytopenia in immunocompetent children after neonatal period.Blood research · 2018Article
- Knowledge of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) among physical and occupational therapists in the United States.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThis study aims to analyze and evaluate the clinic and demographic features of immunocompetent children that have been diagnosed with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The data of children diagnosed with CMV infection between January 2005 and December 2010 and their follow-ups for 2 years were retrospectively evaluated. Ninety-eight patients were included, and the median age at admission was 5.6 months (5 days-36 months). 54.1% was male. The diagnosis of CMV infection was performed by measurement of serum anti-CMV specific Ig M and IgG titers and PCR method in blood and/or urine. In 3.06% of the patients, congenital infection was detected, whereas possible congenital infection was observed in 36.7% of the patients. Furthermore, 44 patients (44.8%) were detected to have perinatal infection while postnatal infection was spotted in 15.3% of the patients. The common presenting manifestations were prolonged jaundice, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal distension, skin eruption, and seizure. And the most common physical examination findings were hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, jaundice, and petechia. The mainstream laboratory results were elevated transaminases (50%), anemia (30.6%), leukocytosis (27.5%), and thrombocytopenia (18.3%). There were intracranial calcification in 5.1% and eye findings in 5.1%. On follow-up of patients, complete improvement (59.1%), neuromotor developmental delay (11.2%), epilepsy (10.2%), hearing loss (3.06 %), hemolytic anemia (2.04%), and growth retardation (1.02%) were detected.
conclusionCMV infection is a significant disease both in congenital and perinatal period. It must be considered that diagnosed patients need to be monitored for a long time with special attention to their neurodevelopmental follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.