Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761959›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

The C957T polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D₂ gene modulates domain-general category learning.

Zilong Xie, W Todd Maddox, John E McGeary, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The effect ofBrain and behavior · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential effects of dopamine-directed treatments on cognition.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zilong XieDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas;
W Todd MaddoxDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas;
John E McGearyDivision of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and Psychologist, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; bchandra@utexas.edu.

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment LearningR01DA032457 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEEVERS, CHRISTOPHER G · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA-032457NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032457NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC-013315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive learning from reward and punishment is vital for human survival. Striatal and frontal dopaminergic activities are associated with adaptive learning. For example, the C957T single nucleotide polymorphism of the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) gene alters striatal D2 receptor availability and affects individuals' adaptive learning ability. Specifically, individuals with the T/T genotype, which is associated with higher striatal D2 availability, show enhanced learning from negative outcomes. Prior work examining DRD2 genetic variability has focused primarily on frontally mediated reflective learning that is under effortful, conscious control. However, less is known about a more automatic, striatally mediated reflexive learning. Here we examined the extent to which this polymorphism differentially influences reflective and reflexive learning across visual and auditory modalities. We employed rule-based (RB) and information-integration (II) category learning paradigms that target reflective and reflexive learning, respectively. Results revealed an advantage in II category learning but poorer RB category learning in T/T homozygotes. The pattern of results was consistent across sensory modalities. These findings suggest that this DRD2 polymorphism exerts opposite influences on domain-general frontally mediated reflective learning and striatally mediated reflexive learning.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAssociation LearningAuditory PerceptionConcept FormationFemaleGenotypeHumansMalePhotic StimulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, Dopamine D2Visual PerceptionYoung AdultReceptors, Dopamine D2D2 receptor availabilityinformation-integration learningrule-based learningsingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID25761959
PMCPMC4440239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.