Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761926›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2015

The gouty tophus: a review.

Ashika Chhana, Nicola Dalbeth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The pathogenesis of gout.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Imaging of gout: an atlas.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashika ChhanaBone and Joint Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd. Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, a.chhana@auckland.ac.nz.
Nicola Dalbeth
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tophus is the cardinal feature of advanced gout. This review summarises recent research into the biology, impact and treatment of tophaceous gout. Microscopically, tophi are chronic foreign body granuloma-like structures containing collections of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals surrounded by inflammatory cells and connective tissue. Extracellular trap formation mediated by neutrophil interactions with MSU crystals may be a central checkpoint in tophus formation. Gouty tophi impact on many aspects of health-related quality of life. Tophi are also implicated in the development of structural joint damage and increased mortality risk in people with gout. Effective treatment of tophaceous gout requires long-term urate-lowering therapy, ideally to achieve a serum urate concentration of <5 mg/dL (300 μmol/L). Recent advances in gout therapeutics have expanded urate-lowering therapy options for patients with severe tophaceous disease to allow faster regression of tophi, improved health-related quality of life and, potentially, improved structural outcomes.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionGoutGout SuppressantsHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUric AcidGout SuppressantsUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID25761926
OpenAlexW2057828410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.