Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761869›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2015

Development of a metabolic biosignature for detection of early Lyme disease.

Claudia R Molins, Laura V Ashton, Gary P Wormser, Ann M Hess, Mark J Delorey, Sebabrata Mahapatra, Martin E Schriefer, John T Belisle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Metabolites of prostaglandin synthases as potential biomarkers of Lyme disease severity and symptom resolution.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insights From Omics in Lyme Disease.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  9. Cholesterol Contributes to Risk, Severity, and Machine Learning-Driven Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Testing Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic approach for Lyme disease patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Metabolic Response in Patients With Post-treatment Lyme Disease Symptoms/Syndrome.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Discovery and Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens.Journal of medical entomology · 2021
    Article
  19. Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia R MolinsDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Laura V AshtonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Gary P WormserDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.
Ann M HessDepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Mark J DeloreyDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Sebabrata MahapatraDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Martin E SchrieferDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
John T BelisleDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

Funding

Metabolic biomarkers and biosignatures for improved diagnosis of Lyme diseaseR33AI100228 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BELISLE, JOHN T · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Metabolic biomarkers and biosignatures for improved diagnosis of Lyme diseaseR21AI100228 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BELISLE, JOHN T · 2012 to 2013
$420k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI100228NIAID NIH HHS R21/R33 AI100228NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI100228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly Lyme disease patients often present to the clinic prior to developing a detectable antibody response to Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent. Thus, existing 2-tier serology-based assays yield low sensitivities (29%-40%) for early infection. The lack of an accurate laboratory test for early Lyme disease contributes to misconceptions about diagnosis and treatment, and underscores the need for new diagnostic approaches.

methodsRetrospective serum samples from patients with early Lyme disease, other diseases, and healthy controls were analyzed for small molecule metabolites by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). A metabolomics data workflow was applied to select a biosignature for classifying early Lyme disease and non-Lyme disease patients. A statistical model of the biosignature was trained using the patients' LC-MS data, and subsequently applied as an experimental diagnostic tool with LC-MS data from additional patient sera. The accuracy of this method was compared with standard 2-tier serology.

resultsMetabolic biosignature development selected 95 molecular features that distinguished early Lyme disease patients from healthy controls. Statistical modeling reduced the biosignature to 44 molecular features, and correctly classified early Lyme disease patients and healthy controls with a sensitivity of 88% (84%-95%), and a specificity of 95% (90%-100%). Importantly, the metabolic biosignature correctly classified 77%-95% of the of serology negative Lyme disease patients.

conclusionsThe data provide proof-of-concept that metabolic profiling for early Lyme disease can achieve significantly greater (P < .0001) diagnostic sensitivity than current 2-tier serology, while retaining high specificity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBorrelia burgdorferiChildChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansLyme DiseaseMaleMass SpectrometryMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedBiomarkersBorrelia burgdorferidiagnosticsinfectious diseasesLyme diseasemetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID25761869
PMCPMC4810808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.