Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761840›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Noradrenergic modulation of risk/reward decision making.

David R Montes, Colin M Stopper, Stan B Floresco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Regulation of the decision threshold by the locus coeruleus.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Schizophrenia and risk preference: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Distinct Medial Orbitofrontal-Striatal Circuits Support Dissociable Component Processes of Risk/Reward Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David R MontesDepartment of Psychology and Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Colin M Stopper
Stan B Floresco
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 89861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCatecholamine transmission modulates numerous cognitive and reward-related processes that can subserve more complex functions such as cost/benefit decision making. Dopamine has been shown to play an integral role in decisions involving reward uncertainty, yet there is a paucity of research investigating the contributions of noradrenaline (NA) transmission to these functions.

objectivesThe present study was designed to elucidate the contribution of NA to risk/reward decision making in rats, assessed with a probabilistic discounting task.

methodsWe examined the effects of reducing noradrenergic transmission with the α2 agonist clonidine (10-100 μg/kg), and increasing activity at α2A receptor sites with the agonist guanfacine (0.1-1 mg/kg), the α2 antagonist yohimbine (1-3 mg/kg), and the noradrenaline transporter (NET) inhibitor atomoxetine (0.3-3 mg/kg) on probabilistic discounting. Rats chose between a small/certain reward and a larger/risky reward, wherein the probability of obtaining the larger reward either decreased (100-12.5 %) or increased (12.5-100 %) over a session.

resultsIn well-trained rats, clonidine reduced risky choice by decreasing reward sensitivity, whereas guanfacine did not affect choice behavior. Yohimbine impaired adjustments in decision biases as reward probability changed within a session by altering negative feedback sensitivity. In a subset of rats that displayed prominent discounting of probabilistic rewards, the lowest dose of atomoxetine increased preference for the large/risky reward when this option had greater long-term utility.

conclusionsThese data highlight an important and previously uncharacterized role for noradrenergic transmission in mediating different aspects of risk/reward decision making and mediating reward and negative feedback sensitivity.

Indexed as

RewardRisk-TakingAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorClonidineConditioning, OperantDecision MakingGuanfacineMaleProbabilityRatsRats, Long-EvansRiskAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsClonidineGuanfacineYohimbine

Identifiers

PMID25761840
OpenAlexW2012862495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.