Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761757›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Cognitive strategies and quality of life of patients with high-grade glioma.

C Lucchiari, A Botturi, A Silvani, E Lamperti, P Gaviani, A Innocenti, C Y Finocchiaro, M Masiero, G Pravettoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. E-Cadherin (Cancers · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A review of the application, feasibility, and the psychometric properties of the individualized measures in cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C LucchiariDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. claudio.lucchiari@unimi.it.
A BotturiDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
A SilvaniDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
E LampertiDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
P GavianiDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
A InnocentiDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
C Y FinocchiaroDepartment of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
M MasieroDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
G PravettoniDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychological well-being, quality of life, and cognitive strategies activated by patients with high-grade glioma. We hypothesized that the self-perceived quality of life is modulated by physical and psychological factors and that in order to understand this modulation more psychometric approaches are necessary. Data were collected from a sample of 73 consecutive patients with a histological diagnosis of primary malignant brain cancer (grade IV glioblastoma and grade III anaplastic astrocytoma) hospitalized in a specialized Italian center. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale and the Schedule of Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) scale were used to assess quality of life. The mean FACT-Brain (Br) score was 122.37. Similarly, the median SEIQoL-DW score was 72.9 out of a maximum value of 100. No gender effect was found in relation to overall quality of life. Patients with high depression and/or anxiety scores reported lower quality of life (QoL) scores in all the instruments considered. We did not find any gender effect concerning depression and anxiety levels. However, we found that men and women, though having similar physical and functional well-being, reported different QoL determinants, since men seem to rely more on physical adjustment, while women activate more introspective strategies. Positive actions, family issues, negative thoughts, health, and positive thoughts were found to be the most reported themes. In conclusion, the present study strongly suggests that a positive psychological adjustment is possible also in the event of a severe diagnosis and during aggressive treatments, but QoL determinants might be considered too in order to help health professionals to understand patients' experience and to meet their needs.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultBrain NeoplasmsCognitionDepressionFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesGenderHigh-grade gliomaQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID25761757
OpenAlexW2037232567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.