Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761571›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Individual Differences in Cue-Induced Motivation and Striatal Systems in Rats Susceptible to Diet-Induced Obesity.

Mike J F Robinson, Paul R Burghardt, Christa M Patterson, Cameron W Nobile, Huda Akil, Stanley J Watson, Kent C Berridge, Carrie R Ferrario

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cell reports methods · 2023
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mike J F Robinson1] Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [2] Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA.
Paul R Burghardt1] Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [2] Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christa M PattersonDivision of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cameron W NobileDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Huda AkilMolecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stanley J WatsonMolecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, The University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kent C BerridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carrie R FerrarioDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

PUBLIC HEALTH DEMONSTRATIONP60DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MYERS, MARTIN G · 1985 to 2012
$26.5M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Affective neuroscience of taste reactivityR01MH063649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2002 to 2024
$7.8M
Cue-triggered Reward SeekingR01DA015188 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2003 to 2021
$4.9M
Can Affective Resilience be Enhanced? A Developmental and Epigenetic ApproachR01MH104261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AKIL, HUDA, WATSON, STANLEY J · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
HEPATITIS C CLINICAL TRIAL- CLINICAL CENTERSN01DK092322 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SHIFFMAN, MITCHELL L · 1999 to 2000
$699k
Neurohormonal and Behavioral Correlates of Obesity and Weight LossK01DK092322 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BURGHARDT, PAUL R · 2012 to 2016
$589k
NIDA NIH HHS DA015188NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015188NIDDK NIH HHS DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK092322NIDDK NIH HHS N01 DK092322NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020572NIMH NIH HHS MH63649NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063649NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian cues associated with junk-foods (caloric, highly sweet, and/or fatty foods), like the smell of brownies, can elicit craving to eat and increase the amount of food consumed. People who are more susceptible to these motivational effects of food cues may have a higher risk for becoming obese. Further, overconsumption of junk-foods leading to the development of obesity may itself heighten attraction to food cues. Here, we used a model of individual susceptibility to junk-foods diet-induced obesity to determine whether there are pre-existing and/or diet-induced increases in attraction to and motivation for sucrose-paired cues (ie, incentive salience or 'wanting'). We also assessed diet- vs obesity-associated alterations in mesolimbic function and receptor expression. We found that rats susceptible to diet-induced obesity displayed heightened conditioned approach prior to the development of obesity. In addition, after junk-food diet exposure, those rats that developed obesity also showed increased willingness to gain access to a sucrose cue. Heightened 'wanting' was not due to individual differences in the hedonic impact ('liking') of sucrose. Neurobiologically, Mu opioid receptor mRNA expression was lower in striatal 'hot-spots' that generate eating or hedonic impact only in those rats that became obese. In contrast, prolonged exposure to junk-food resulted in cross-sensitization to amphetamine-induced locomotion and downregulation of striatal D2R mRNA regardless of the development of obesity. Together these data shed light on individual differences in behavioral and neurobiological consequences of exposure to junk-food diets and the potential contribution of incentive sensitization in susceptible individuals to greater food cue-triggered motivation.

Indexed as

CuesIndividualityAmphetamineAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDietDisease SusceptibilityFastingInsulinLeptinMaleMotivationObesityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, DopamineAmphetamineInsulinLeptinReceptors, DopamineReceptors, Opioid, muTyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID25761571
PMCPMC4613617
OpenAlexW2054297616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.