Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761436›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2015

Ultrasound observations of subtle movements: a pilot study comparing foetuses of smoking and nonsmoking mothers.

Nadja Reissland, Brian Francis, Kumar Kumarendran, James Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nadja ReisslandDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Brian FrancisDepartment of Maths and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Kumar KumarendranThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
James MasonSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Stockton, UK.
Durham University · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOne way to assess foetal health of smokers is to ask mothers to count perceived movements, an unreliable method hiding differences in prenatal development. The aim of this pilot study was to assess subtle foetal movements in ultrasound scans and establish whether they differ in foetuses of mothers who smoked and nonsmoking mothers.

methodsThis longitudinal pilot study recruited twenty mothers (16 nonsmoking; 4 smoking) scanned four times from 24 to 36 weeks gestation (80 ultrasound scans). Two types of fine-grained movements were coded offline and analysed using a Poisson log-linear mixed model.

resultsFoetuses of smoking mothers showed a significantly higher rate of mouth movements compared to foetuses of nonsmoking mothers (p = 0.02), after controlling for maternal stress and depression. As pregnancy progressed, these differences between the smoking and nonsmoking groups widened. Differences between the two groups in the rate of foetal facial self-touch remained constant as pregnancy progressed and were borderline significant (p = 0.07).

conclusionRates of foetal mouth movement and facial self-touch differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers. A larger study is needed to confirm these results and to investigate specific effects, including the interaction of maternal stress and smoking. Additionally, the feasibility of this technique for clinical practice should be assessed.

Indexed as

Fetal MovementSmokingUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPilot ProjectsPregnancyYoung AdultFine-grained foetal movementsFoetal 4D ultrasoundMaternal stressSmoking

Identifiers

PMID25761436
PMCPMC4654233
OpenAlexW2162455854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.