Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761392›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2016

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks.

Barbara Blakeslee, Davis Cope, Mark E McCourt

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lateral effects in pattern vision.Journal of vision · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara BlakesleeDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Davis CopeDepartment of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Mark E McCourtDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA. mark.mccourt@ndsu.edu.
North Dakota State University · US

Funding

Center for Visual and Cognitive NeuroscienceP20GM103505 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2012 to 2014
$6.3M
Spatial &Temporal Interactions in Brightness PerceptionR01EY014015 · NEI · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLAKESLEE, BARBARA · 2003 to 2006
$691k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014015NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityHumansModels, TheoreticalNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionComplex visual stimuliModel of brightnessNotebooksODOG model predictions

Identifiers

PMID25761392
PMCPMC4567956
OpenAlexW2025614135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.