Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25761380›Full record

ArticleErgonomics2015

Health surveillance under adverse ergonomics conditions--validity of a screening method adapted for the occupational health service.

Dirk Jonker, Ewa Gustafsson, Bo Rolander, Inger Arvidsson, Catarina Nordander

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ergonomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vibration related symptoms and signs in quarry and foundry workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Vibration-induced injuries in workers exposed to transient and high frequency vibrations.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dirk Jonkera Futurum - Academy for Health and Care , Jönköping , Sweden.
Ewa Gustafsson
Bo Rolander
Inger Arvidsson
Catarina Nordander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new health surveillance protocol for work-related upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders has been validated by comparing the results with a reference protocol. The studied protocol, Health Surveillance in Adverse Ergonomics Conditions (HECO), is a new version of the reference protocol modified for application in the Occupational Health Service (OHS). The HECO protocol contains both a screening part and a diagnosing part. Sixty-three employees were examined. The screening in HECO did not miss any diagnosis found when using the reference protocol, but in comparison to the reference protocol considerable time savings could be achieved. Fair to good agreement between the protocols was obtained for one or more diagnoses in neck/shoulders (86%, k = 0.62) and elbow/hands (84%, k = 0.49). Therefore, the results obtained using the HECO protocol can be compared with a reference material collected with the reference protocol, and thus provide information of the magnitude of disorders in an examined work group. Practitioner Summary: The HECO protocol is a relatively simple physical examination protocol for identification of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck and upper extremities. The protocol is a reliable and cost-effective tool for the OHS to use for occupational health surveillance in order to detect workplaces at high risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAdultAgedDentistryErgonomicsFemaleHousehold WorkHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesNeckPopulation SurveillanceUpper ExtremityYoung AdultHECOneck/shoulderOHSphysical examinationupper extremitiesupper limb

Identifiers

PMID25761380
PMCPMC4566900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.