ArticleSurgical infections2015
Divergent invariant natural killer T-cell response to sepsis of abdominal vs. non-abdominal origin in human beings.
Article in Surgical infections, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of immune suppression in sepsis/shock: one investigator's/lab group's experience (SLB 2024 legacy award presentation).Journal of leukocyte biology · 2025Article
- The Role of PD-1/PD-L1 and IL-7 in Lymphocyte Dynamics and Sepsis Progression: A Biomarker Study in Critically Ill Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Observational
- invariant Natural Killer T Cells Modulate the Peritoneal Macrophage Response to Polymicrobial Sepsis.The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- Innate Lymphocyte Th1 and Th17 Responses in Elderly Hospitalised Patients with Infection and Sepsis.Vaccines · 2020Article
- Lymphocyte integrin expression differences between SIRS and sepsis patients.Irish journal of medical science · 2017Article
- Effect of PD-1: PD-L1 in Invariant Natural Killer T-Cell Emigration and Chemotaxis Following Sepsis.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2016Article
- Pathophysiology of septic shock: From bench to bedside.Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe etiology of sepsis is broad. The peritoneal cavity displays compartmentalization with respect to inflammatory responses, so peripheral blood responses to sepsis of abdominal vs. non-abdominal origin are expected to be divergent. Lymphocytes and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells play important roles in survival from sepsis, as they dampen the neutrophil and macrophage responses. We assessed whether circulating iNKT cells display distinct phenotypic profiles depending on the presence of abdominal vs. non-abdominal infection with sepsis.
methodsPatients with sepsis, defined as infection confirmed microbiologically with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), were enrolled prospectively. They were categorized as having either exclusively sepsis of abdominal or exclusively non-abdominal origin. The white blood cell (WBC) count was recorded. Whole-blood staining with monoclonal antibodies to CD3, V-alpha-24 (to identify iNKT cells), and CD69 (marker of early activation) was applied.
resultsOf the 53 enrolled patients, 18 had abdominal infection. Pneumonia was the most common non-abdominal type. There was no difference in gender, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, WBC count, or CD3(+) T cells (7.1%±1.6% vs. 6.5%±0.9%; p=0.75) in the two groups. Patients with abdominal infection had a higher proportion of iNKT cells (2.7%±1.1% vs. 0.89%±0.14%; p=0.032). Correcting for WBC count, this translated into a higher absolute number of iNKT cells (3.4±1.8×10(7)/L vs. 0.74±0.15×10(7)/L; p=0.03). Patients with sepsis of abdominal origin had a lower percentage of CD69(+) iNKT cells (9.1%±3.1% vs. 27.2%±5.8%; p=0.028). In patients in shock vs. those who were not, patients with non-abdominal infection exhibited a greater number of iNKT cells (1.47±0.3 v. 0.62±0.1×10(7)/L; p=0.022) and percentage of activated iNKT cells (53±14.5% vs. 17.9±4.8%; p=0.04). Patients with non-abdominal infection who died had a lower absolute number of activated iNKT cells (0.8±1.2×10(7)/L vs. 0.34±0.1×10(7)/L; p=0.023); however, no such shock or death correlation was noted in patients with sepsis of abdominal origin.
conclusionsDivergent sepsis etiologies display distinct blood iNKT cell population changes. In non-abdominal infection, this difference was associated with septic shock and death. Elucidating the importance and basis for these changes relative to the response to sources of infection will help clarify appropriate diagnosis and management of the patient with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.