ArticleJournal of patient safety2018
Label Design Affects Medication Safety in an Operating Room Crisis: A Controlled Simulation Study.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Medication Errors in Intensive Care Settings and Operating Rooms-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Estimating the impact of label design on reducing the risk of medication errors by applying HEART in drug administration.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Look-alike medications in the perioperative setting: scoping review of medication incidents and risk reduction interventions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Critical Care Nurses' Perception of Medication Administration Errors in Kelantan, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Reminding staff of diligence during the medication process is not enough to ensure safety: Learning from wrong fluid product selection incidents in the care of critically ill patients.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Intravenous therapy device labeling in Intensive Care Units: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2022Review
- Optimising antimicrobial use in humans - review of current evidence and an interdisciplinary consensus on key priorities for research.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2021Review
- Package Design Affects Accuracy Recognition for Medications.Human factors · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSeveral factors contribute to medication errors in clinical practice settings, including the design of medication labels. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of label design on medication safety in a realistic, high-stress clinical situation.
methodsNinety-six anesthesia trainee participants were randomly assigned to either the redesigned or the current label condition. Participants were blinded to the study's focus on medication label design and their assigned label condition. Each participant was the sole anesthesia provider in a simulated operating room scenario involving an unexpected vascular injury. The surgeon asked the participant to administer hetastarch to the simulated patient because of hemodynamic instability. The fluid drawer of the anesthesia cart contained three 500-ml intravenous bags of hetastarch and one 500-ml intravenous bag of lidocaine. We hypothesized that redesigned labels would help participants correctly select hetastarch from the cart. If the participants incorrectly selected lidocaine from the cart, we hypothesized that the redesigned labels would help participants detect the lidocaine before administration.
resultsThe percentage of participants who correctly selected hetastarch from the cart was significantly higher for the redesigned labels than the current labels (63% versus 40%; odds ratio, 2.61 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.1]; P = 0.03). Of the participants who incorrectly selected lidocaine from the cart, the percentage who detected the lidocaine before administration did not differ by label condition.
conclusionsThe redesigned labels helped participants correctly select hetastarch from the cart, thus preventing some potentially catastrophic medication errors from reaching the simulated patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.