ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2015
Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Funding of Studies Supporting IA Guideline Recommendations in Cardiovascular Medicine-A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- The Current Landscape of Clinical Studies Focusing on Thyroid Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Study Characteristics and Their Publication Status.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and Physician and Patient Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019Pooled it
- The clinical trials landscape for glioblastoma: is it adequate to develop new treatments?Neuro-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review.PLoS medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Quality and Reporting Accuracy of Phase 1 Drug Radiation Clinical Trials.JAMA oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Prospective adverse event risk evaluation in clinical trials.Health care management science · 2022Trial
- Effect of Pimobendan in Dogs with Preclinical Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease and Cardiomegaly: The EPIC Study-A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2016Trial
- Article
- Review
- Optimizing Development of Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Consistency Between Clinical Trial Registry Entries and Journal Publications in Transfusion Medicine: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent Trends in Clinical Trials for Pediatric Sarcoma in the United States: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of safety reporting in interventional trials of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a registry-publication comparison study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Research waste in total knee arthroplasty studies: an observational study on registered trials.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Retrieval-enhanced drafting of ClinicalTrials.gov data elements from clinical protocols.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Comparison of High-Intensity Electromagnetic Therapy and Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises in Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Letter].International journal of women's health · 2026Article
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) mandates timely reporting of results of applicable clinical trials to ClinicalTrials.gov. We characterized the proportion of applicable clinical trials with publicly available results and determined independent factors associated with the reporting of results.
methodsUsing an algorithm based on input from the National Library of Medicine, we identified trials that were likely to be subject to FDAAA provisions (highly likely applicable clinical trials, or HLACTs) from 2008 through 2013. We determined the proportion of HLACTs that reported results within the 12-month interval mandated by the FDAAA or at any time during the 5-year study period. We used regression models to examine characteristics associated with reporting at 12 months and throughout the 5-year study period.
resultsFrom all the trials at ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified 13,327 HLACTs that were terminated or completed from January 1, 2008, through August 31, 2012. Of these trials, 77.4% were classified as drug trials. A total of 36.9% of the trials were phase 2 studies, and 23.4% were phase 3 studies; 65.6% were funded by industry. Only 13.4% of trials reported summary results within 12 months after trial completion, whereas 38.3% reported results at any time up to September 27, 2013. Timely reporting was independently associated with factors such as FDA oversight, a later trial phase, and industry funding. A sample review suggested that 45% of industry-funded trials were not required to report results, as compared with 6% of trials funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and 9% of trials that were funded by other government or academic institutions.
conclusionsDespite ethical and legal obligations to disclose findings promptly, most HLACTs did not report results to ClinicalTrials.gov in a timely fashion during the study period. Industry-funded trials adhered to legal obligations more often than did trials funded by the NIH or other government or academic institutions. (Funded by the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative and the NIH.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.