Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25760275›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2015

Clostridium difficile drug pipeline: challenges in discovery and development of new agents.

Angie M Jarrad, Tomislav Karoli, Mark A T Blaskovich, Dena Lyras, Matthew A Cooper

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  6. A Potent and Narrow-Spectrum Antibacterial againstJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. AmidinoquinoxalineRSC advances · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Omic" Approaches to Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in antibiotic alternatives forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Cationic Peptidomimetic Amphiphiles Having aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolution of clinical guidelines for antimicrobial management ofTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angie M Jarrad†The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Tomislav Karoli†The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Mark A T Blaskovich†The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Dena Lyras‡School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Matthew A Cooper†The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 094977/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade Clostridium difficile has become a bacterial pathogen of global significance. Epidemic strains have spread throughout hospitals, while community acquired infections and other sources ensure a constant inoculation of spores into hospitals. In response to the increasing medical burden, a new C. difficile antibiotic, fidaxomicin, was approved in 2011 for the treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Rudimentary fecal transplants are also being trialed as effective treatments. Despite these advances, therapies that are more effective against C. difficile spores and less damaging to the resident gastrointestinal microbiome and that reduce recurrent disease are still desperately needed. However, bringing a new treatment for C. difficile infection to market involves particular challenges. This review covers the current drug discovery pipeline, including both small molecule and biologic therapies, and highlights the challenges associated with in vitro and in vivo models of C. difficile infection for drug screening and lead optimization.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25760275
PMCPMC4500462
OpenAlexW2039153340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.