ArticlePloS one2015
Prediction of chemical respiratory sensitizers using GARD, a novel in vitro assay based on a genomic biomarker signature.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A TRPA1-mediated substance P release assay as anFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Assessment of immunotoxicity in the 21st century: Where we are and what we need to replace animals.Current opinion in toxicology · 2025Article
- Refining the Amino Reactivity-Based Identification of Respiratory Sensitizers.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Development of a novel in vitro respiratory sensitization assay and its application in an integrated testing strategy (ITS).Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Occupational exposure and its mechanistic link to allergic asthma and lung function decline; a data-driven approach coupled to mining of adverse outcome pathway signatures.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- Gene regulation and signaling pathways in immune response to respiratory sensitizers: a database analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Responses of anToxics · 2024Article
- The transcriptomic signature of respiratory sensitizers using an alveolar model.Cell biology and toxicology · 2024Article
- Chemical respiratory sensitization-Current status of mechanistic understanding, knowledge gaps and possible identification methods of sensitizers.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- An In Vitro Alveolar Model Allows for the Rapid Assessment of Particles for Respiratory Sensitization Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Mapping Chemical Respiratory Sensitization: How Useful Are Our Current Computational Tools?Chemical research in toxicology · 2021Article
- The GARDpotency Assay for Potency-Associated Subclassification of Chemical Skin Sensitizers-Rationale, Method Development, and Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020Article
- Skin Sensitization Testing-What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.Toxicology research · 2018Review
- Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers-What Is Good Enough?International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Prediction of Chemical Respiratory and Contact Sensitizers by OX40L Expression in Dendritic Cells Using a Novel 3D Coculture System.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepeated exposure to certain low molecular weight (LMW) chemical compounds may result in development of allergic reactions in the skin or in the respiratory tract. In most cases, a certain LMW compound selectively sensitize the skin, giving rise to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), or the respiratory tract, giving rise to occupational asthma (OA). To limit occurrence of allergic diseases, efforts are currently being made to develop predictive assays that accurately identify chemicals capable of inducing such reactions. However, while a few promising methods for prediction of skin sensitization have been described, to date no validated method, in vitro or in vivo, exists that is able to accurately classify chemicals as respiratory sensitizers.
resultsRecently, we presented the in vitro based Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay as a novel testing strategy for classification of skin sensitizing chemicals based on measurement of a genomic biomarker signature. We have expanded the applicability domain of the GARD assay to classify also respiratory sensitizers by identifying a separate biomarker signature containing 389 differentially regulated genes for respiratory sensitizers in comparison to non-respiratory sensitizers. By using an independent data set in combination with supervised machine learning, we validated the assay, showing that the identified genomic biomarker is able to accurately classify respiratory sensitizers.
conclusionsWe have identified a genomic biomarker signature for classification of respiratory sensitizers. Combining this newly identified biomarker signature with our previously identified biomarker signature for classification of skin sensitizers, we have developed a novel in vitro testing strategy with a potent ability to predict both skin and respiratory sensitization in the same sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.